Rethink 3D Object Detection from Physical World
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-accuracy and low-latency 3D object detection is essential for autonomous driving systems. While previous studies on 3D object detection often evaluate performance based on mean average precision (mAP) and latency, they typically fail to address the trade-off between speed and accuracy, such as 60.0 mAP at 100 ms vs 61.0 mAP at 500 ms. A quantitative assessment of the trade-offs between different hardware devices and accelerators remains unexplored, despite being critical for real-time applications. Furthermore, they overlook the impact on collision avoidance in motion planning, for example, 60.0 mAP leading to safer motion planning or 61.0 mAP leading to high-risk motion planning. In this paper, we introduce latency-aware AP (L-AP) and planning-aware AP (P-AP) as new metrics, which consider the physical world such as the concept of time and physical constraints, offering a more comprehensive evaluation for real-time 3D object detection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our metrics for the entire autonomous driving system using nuPlan dataset, and evaluate 3D object detection models accounting for hardware differences and accelerators. We also develop a state-of-the-art performance model for real-time 3D object detection through latency-aware hyperparameter optimization (L-HPO) using our metrics. Additionally, we quantitatively demonstrate that the assumption "the more point clouds, the better the recognition performance" is incorrect for real-time applications and optimize both hardware and model selection using our metrics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.
Builds on
44 of 50 references.
References · 44
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
- 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
- 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,577
- 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
- 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,218
- 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,144
- 2020Lift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images From Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3Dcited by 1,044
- 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 891
- 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 850
- 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 724
32 more
- 2021BEVDet: High-performance Multi-camera 3D Object Detection in Bird-Eye-Viewcited by 713
- 2021DETR3D: 3D Object Detection from Multi-view Images via 3D-to-2D Queriescited by 658
- 2017Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Datacited by 640
- 2022BEVDepth: Acquisition of Reliable Depth for Multi-view 3D Object Detectioncited by 572
- 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 466
- 2019PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 449
- 20203DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detectorcited by 440
- 2019PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 358
- 2022BEVFusion: A Simple and Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion Frameworkcited by 336
- 2023Exploring Object-Centric Temporal Modeling for Efficient Multi-View 3D Object Detectioncited by 315
- 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 242
- 2022FUTR3D: A Unified Sensor Fusion Framework for 3D Detectioncited by 194
- 2022BEVerse: Unified Perception and Prediction in Birds-Eye-View for Vision-Centric Autonomous Drivingcited by 191
- 2022Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wildcited by 160
- 2022Delving into the Devils of Bird's-eye-view Perception: A Review, Evaluation and Recipecited by 122
- 2024Towards learning-based planning:The nuPlan benchmark for real-world autonomous drivingcited by 104
- 2022Multi-modal Sensor Fusion for Auto Driving Perception: A Surveycited by 76
- 2023Far3D: Expanding the Horizon for Surround-view 3D Object Detectioncited by 70
- 20203D Point Cloud Processing and Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 68
- 2018YOLO3D: End-to-end real-time 3D Oriented Object Bounding Box Detection from LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 32
- 2023Fully Sparse Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 29
- 2023Detecting As Labeling: Rethinking LiDAR-camera Fusion in 3D Object Detectioncited by 28
- 2022LET-3D-AP: Longitudinal Error Tolerant 3D Average Precision for Camera-Only 3D Detectioncited by 27
- 2021Injecting Planning-Awareness into Prediction and Detection Evaluationcited by 21
- 2024MultiCorrupt: A Multi-Modal Robustness Dataset and Benchmark of LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 17
- 2022DeepFusion: A Robust and Modular 3D Object Detector for Lidars, Cameras and Radarscited by 16
- 2022Evaluating Object (mis)Detection from a Safety and Reliability Perspective: Discussion and Measurescited by 8
- 2024Towards Stable 3D Object Detectioncited by 7
- 2024Improving Distant 3D Object Detection Using 2D Box Supervisioncited by 6
- 2022LidarNAS: Unifying and Searching Neural Architectures for 3D Point Cloudscited by 4
- 2022Cost-Aware Evaluation and Model Scaling for LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 3
- 2022MTBF Model for AVs -- From Perception Errors to Vehicle-Level Failurescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.