Advancing Multi-Step Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models through Multi-Layered Self-Reflection with Auto-Prompting
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved their problem-solving capabilities. However, these models still struggle when faced with complex multi-step reasoning tasks. In this paper, we propose the Multi-Layered Self-Reflection with Auto-Prompting (MAPS) framework, a novel approach designed to enhance multi-step mathematical reasoning in LLMs by integrating techniques such as Chain of Thought (CoT), Self-Reflection, and Auto-Prompting. Unlike traditional static prompting methods, MAPS employs an iterative refinement process. Initially, the model generates a solution using CoT prompting. When errors are detected, an adaptive self-reflection mechanism identifies and analyzes them, generating tailored prompts to guide corrections. These dynamically adjusted prompts enable the model to iteratively refine its reasoning. Experiments on four well-established benchmarks across multiple LLMs show that MAPS significantly outperforms standard CoT and achieves competitive results with reasoning-optimized models. In addition, MAPS enables general-purpose LLMs to reach performance levels comparable to specialized reasoning models. While deeper reflection layers improve accuracy, they also increase token usage and costs. To balance this trade-off, MAPS strategically limits reflection depth, ensuring an optimal balance between cost and reasoning performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.
Builds on
12 of 19 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models7 Oct
- 2024Achieving >97% on GSM8K: Deeply Understanding the Problems Makes LLMs Better Solvers for Math Word Problems23 Apr
Other references · 10
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 525
- 2024LLMs Still Can't Plan; Can LRMs? A Preliminary Evaluation of OpenAI's o1 on PlanBenchcited by 94
- 2024Self-Reflection in LLM Agents: Effects on Problem-Solving Performancecited by 39
- 2024Self-Reflection Makes Large Language Models Safer, Less Biased, and Ideologically Neutralcited by 20
- 2025Reasoning based on symbolic and parametric knowledge bases: a surveycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025ScRPO: From Errors to Insightscited by 1
- 2025ScRPO: From Errors to Insights8 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on Mathematics
- 2025A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2024Expanding Search Space with Diverse Prompting Agents: An Efficient Sampling Approach for LLM Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Enhancing Long-Chain Reasoning Distillation through Error-Aware Self-Reflection
- 2024Step Guided Reasoning: Improving Mathematical Reasoning using Guidance Generation and Step Reasoning
- 2025Instruct-of-Reflection: Enhancing Large Language Models Iterative Reflection Capabilities via Dynamic-Meta Instruction
- 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoning
- 2023From Good to Great: Improving Math Reasoning with Tool-Augmented Interleaf Prompting