mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Expanding Search Space with Diverse Prompting Agents: An Efficient Sampling Approach for LLM Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv 2410.09780 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in many complex tasks including mathematical reasoning. However, traditional approaches heavily rely on ensuring self-consistency within single prompting method, which limits the exploration of diverse problem-solving strategies. This study addresses these limitations by performing an experimental analysis of distinct prompting methods within the domain of mathematical reasoning. Our findings demonstrate that each method explores a distinct search space, and this differentiation becomes more evident with increasing problem complexity. To leverage this phenomenon, we applied efficient sampling process that uniformly combines samples from these diverse methods, which not only expands the maximum search space but achieves higher performance with fewer runs compared to single methods. Especially, within the subset of difficult questions of MATH dataset named MATH-hard, The maximum search space was achieved while utilizing approximately 43% fewer runs than single methods on average. These findings highlight the importance of integrating diverse problem-solving strategies to enhance the reasoning abilities of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.

Builds on

12 of 16 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Don't Trust: Verify -- Grounding LLM Quantitative Reasoning with Autoformalization26 Mar
  2. 2023Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verification15 Aug

Other references · 10

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  5. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 356
  7. 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 281
  8. 2024Debug like a Human: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step-by-stepcited by 123
  9. 2023Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 94
  10. 2024RAT: Retrieval Augmented Thoughts Elicit Context-Aware Reasoning in Long-Horizon Generationcited by 75

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts
  2. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges
  3. 2025A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
  4. 2023Assessing the Impact of Prompting Methods on ChatGPT's Mathematical Capabilities
  5. 2024Look Before You Leap: Problem Elaboration Prompting Improves Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models
  6. 2025Teaching LLMs to Think Mathematically: A Critical Study of Decision-Making via Optimization
  7. 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models for Math Reasoning Tasks
  8. 2024MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time