mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAC Bench: Do Foundation Models Understand Prerequisites for Executing Manipulation Policies?

arXiv 2506.23725 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly pivotal for generalist robot manipulation, enabling tasks such as physical reasoning, policy generation, and failure detection. However, their proficiency in these high-level applications often assumes a deep understanding of low-level physical prerequisites, a capability that remains largely unverified. For robots to perform actions reliably, they must comprehend intrinsic object properties (e.g., material, weight), action affordances (e.g., graspable, stackable), and physical constraints (e.g., stability, reachability, or an object's state, such as being closed). Despite the widespread use of VLMs in manipulation tasks, we argue that off-the-shelf models may lack this granular, physically grounded understanding, as such prerequisites are often overlooked during training. To address this critical gap, we introduce PAC Bench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to systematically evaluate VLMs on their understanding of core Properties, Affordances, and Constraints (PAC) from a task executability perspective. PAC Bench features a diverse dataset with over 30,000 annotations, comprising 673 real-world images (115 object classes, 15 property types, and 1 to 3 affordances defined per class), 100 real-world humanoid-view scenarios, and 120 unique simulated constraint scenarios across four tasks. Our evaluations reveal significant gaps in the ability of current VLMs to grasp fundamental physical concepts, highlighting limitations in their suitability for reliable robot manipulation and pointing to key areas for targeted research. PAC Bench also serves as a standardized benchmark for rigorously evaluating physical reasoning in VLMs and guiding the development of more robust, physically grounded models for robotic applications. Project Page: https://pacbench.github.io/

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.

Builds on

16 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025ManipBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Low-Level Robot Manipulation14 May
  2. 2025PhysVLM: Enabling Visual Language Models to Understand Robotic Physical Reachability11 Mar
  3. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control28 Jul

Other references · 13

  1. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  2. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
  3. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  4. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,484
  5. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
  6. 2024RoboCasa: Large-Scale Simulation of Everyday Tasks for Generalist Robotscited by 407
  7. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 366
  8. 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 153
  9. 2024AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policiescited by 74
  10. 2024CARES: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Trustworthiness in Medical Vision Language Modelscited by 64
  11. 2024VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Modelscited by 53
  12. 2024HRP: Human Affordances for Robotic Pre-Trainingcited by 44
1 more
  1. 20252HandedAfforder: Learning Precise Actionable Bimanual Affordances from Human Videoscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Task-oriented Robotic Manipulation with Vision Language Models
  2. 2025Large VLM-based Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation: A Survey
  3. 2023Physically Grounded Vision-Language Models for Robotic Manipulation
  4. 2026Spa-Bench: A Real-Robot Benchmark for Spatial Grounding in Vision-Language-Action Models
  5. 2024What Matters in Building Vision-Language-Action Models for Generalist Robots
  6. 2025OmniManip: Towards General Robotic Manipulation via Object-Centric Interaction Primitives as Spatial Constraints
  7. 2025Vision Language Action Models in Robotic Manipulation: A Systematic Review
  8. 2026VLMs are Native Action Models: Unleashing the Manipulation Capabilities of VLMs with Explicit Action-Space Grounding