mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Spa-Bench: A Real-Robot Benchmark for Spatial Grounding in Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv 2610.12696 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) offer a promising route toward general-purpose robotics by transferring semantic knowledge from large-scale vision-language pretraining into language-conditioned control. However, most VLA evaluations emphasize aggregate manipulation success under changes in objects, instructions, or environments, leaving unclear how reliably these policies ground spatial descriptions in the physical scenes where they act. We therefore ask a sharper question: how reliably can current VLAs translate spatial descriptions into appropriate real-robot behavior? To investigate this, we introduce Spa-Bench, a real-robot benchmark that evaluates spatial grounding across six tabletop tasks covering Object State, Relative Size, Referential Description, Relational Placement, Ordinal Position, and Counting. Our primary evaluation compares in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) spatial configurations while retaining training support for the relevant objects, concepts, and actions, reducing object and motor unfamiliarity as alternative explanations for failure. Four diagnostic conditions further probe physical execution, sensitivity to wording, object-task associations, and recognition that no action is required. We release 4,092 episodes collected on the SO-101 robot arm: 1,200 human-teleoperated demonstrations and 2,892 real-robot evaluation rollouts from five state-of-the-art VLA policies. Across the three fully evaluated policies, success falls from 67.5-73.3% on ID spatial configurations to 40.7-52.0% on OOD spatial configurations, while matched direct instructions improve success by 28.3-40.0 percentage points. These results show that the evaluated VLAs can often execute the required manipulations but lack robust spatial grounding. Project materials, including videos, code, and benchmark data, are available at https://justintiensmith.github.io/Spa-Bench/.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026RoboIRGBench: Benchmarking Implicit Referential Grounding in Vision-Language-Action Models
  2. 2025InternVLA-M1: A Spatially Guided Vision-Language-Action Framework for Generalist Robot Policy
  3. 2026EmbodimentSemantic: A Spatial Scene-Graph Dataset and Benchmark for Vision-Language Models on Embodied Manipulation Trajectories
  4. 2026Spatially Grounded Long-Horizon Task Planning in the Wild
  5. 2026Pointing-VLA: Typed Spatial Grounding Interfaces for Vision-Language-Action Manipulation
  6. 2025From Seeing to Doing: Bridging Reasoning and Decision for Robotic Manipulation
  7. 2026Direct Action-Head Injection of A Grounded 3D Point Unlocks Spatial and Task Generalization
  8. 2026GroundingPI: A Grounding Foundation Model towards Physical Intelligence with Visual Primitives