Strategic A/B testing via Maximum Probability-driven Two-armed Bandit
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting a minor average treatment effect is a major challenge in large-scale applications, where even minimal improvements can have a significant economic impact. Traditional methods, reliant on normal distribution-based or expanded statistics, often fail to identify such minor effects because of their inability to handle small discrepancies with sufficient sensitivity. This work leverages a counterfactual outcome framework and proposes a maximum probability-driven two-armed bandit (TAB) process by weighting the mean volatility statistic, which controls Type I error. The implementation of permutation methods further enhances the robustness and efficacy. The established strategic central limit theorem (SCLT) demonstrates that our approach yields a more concentrated distribution under the null hypothesis and a less concentrated one under the alternative hypothesis, greatly improving statistical power. The experimental results indicate a significant improvement in the A/B testing, highlighting the potential to reduce experimental costs while maintaining high statistical power.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2025.
Builds on
6 of 44 references.
References · 6
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
- 2024Applied Causal Inference Powered by ML and AIcited by 30
- 2018Cauchy combination test: a powerful test with analytic p-value calculation under arbitrary dependency structurescited by 20
- 2021Machine Learning for Variance Reduction in Online Experimentscited by 17
- 2021Towards Optimal Variance Reduction in Online Controlled Experimentscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.