mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can "consciousness" be observed from large language model (LLM) internal states? Dissecting LLM representations obtained from Theory of Mind test with Integrated Information Theory and Span Representation analysis

arXiv 2506.22516 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.NEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Integrated Information Theory (IIT) provides a quantitative framework for explaining consciousness phenomenon, positing that conscious systems comprise elements integrated through causal properties. We apply IIT 3.0 and 4.0 -- the latest iterations of this framework -- to sequences of Large Language Model (LLM) representations, analyzing data derived from existing Theory of Mind (ToM) test results. Our study systematically investigates whether the differences of ToM test performances, when presented in the LLM representations, can be revealed by IIT estimates, i.e., Phimax (IIT 3.0), Phi (IIT 4.0), Conceptual Information (IIT 3.0), and Phi-structure (IIT 4.0). Furthermore, we compare these metrics with the Span Representations independent of any estimate for consciousness. This additional effort aims to differentiate between potential "consciousness" phenomena and inherent separations within LLM representational space. We conduct comprehensive experiments examining variations across LLM transformer layers and linguistic spans from stimuli. Our results suggest that sequences of contemporary Transformer-based LLM representations lack statistically significant indicators of observed "consciousness" phenomena but exhibit intriguing patterns under textitspatio-permutational analyses. The Appendix and code are available as Supplementary Materials at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100163.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.

Builds on

21 of 99 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  4. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  5. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
  6. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  7. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 644
  8. 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 525
  9. 2024Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interactioncited by 170
  10. 2024The pitfalls of next-token predictioncited by 160
  11. 2018Dissecting Contextual Word Embeddings: Architecture and Representationcited by 146
  12. 2017The Consciousness Priorcited by 107
9 more
  1. 2023Could a Large Language Model be Conscious?cited by 73
  2. 2023Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Examining Performance of 11 State-of-the-Art models vs. Children Aged 7-10 on Advanced Testscited by 48
  3. 2022Analyzing Encoded Concepts in Transformer Language Modelscited by 38
  4. 2022Integrated information theory (IIT) 4.0: Formulating the properties of phenomenal existence in physical termscited by 21
  5. 2022Language models are better than humans at next-token predictioncited by 15
  6. 2019Not All Attention Is Needed: Gated Attention Network for Sequence Datacited by 13
  7. 2023Mapping Brains with Language Models: A Surveycited by 8
  8. 2024Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousnesscited by 8
  9. 2017PyPhi: A toolbox for integrated information theorycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.