mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Open Proof Corpus: A Large-Scale Study of LLM-Generated Mathematical Proofs

arXiv 2506.21621 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent months, large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in mathematical proof generation, but further advancement is hindered by the lack of a large-scale, high-quality dataset of human-evaluated proofs. While expensive to create, such a dataset is essential for driving improvements in training and enabling a rigorous analysis of proof generation capabilities. In this work, we present the Open Proof Corpus (OPC), a dataset comprising over 5,000 human-evaluated proofs produced by state-of-the-art LLMs. The OPC was specifically designed for broad applicability and downstream usage in proof generation research and is the first to include a substantial number of correct, LLM-generated solutions to problems from prestigious mathematics competitions such as the USAMO and IMO. Using the OPC, we explore critical questions in automated proof generation: (1) the performance gap between natural language and formal proof generation, (2) the discrepancy between final-answer accuracy and full-proof validity, and (3) the impact of best-of-n selection on proof quality. Finally, to showcase the utility of the OPC, we finetune an 8B-parameter model on the dataset, obtaining a model that performs on par with the best model, Gemini-2.5-Pro, on the task of evaluating proof correctness.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.

Builds on

40 of 52 references.

References · 40

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  5. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  6. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  7. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  8. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  9. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  10. 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 380
  11. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 308
  12. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 304
28 more
  1. 2025The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexitycited by 298
  2. 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 277
  3. 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 275
  4. 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 270
  5. 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 263
  6. 2025DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoningcited by 261
  7. 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategiescited by 236
  8. 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 227
  9. 2024A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmeticcited by 188
  10. 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
  11. 2025AIMO-2 Winning Solution: Building State-of-the-Art Mathematical Reasoning Models with OpenMathReasoning datasetcited by 165
  12. 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 153
  13. 2025Goedel-Prover: A Frontier Model for Open-Source Automated Theorem Provingcited by 126
  14. 2025Big-Math: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Math Dataset for Reinforcement Learning in Language Modelscited by 104
  15. 2024Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Surveycited by 82
  16. 2025Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiadcited by 72
  17. 2024Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Beyond Accuracycited by 69
  18. 2025FormalMATH: Benchmarking Formal Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Modelscited by 45
  19. 2025DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  20. 2025Brains vs. Bytes: Evaluating LLM Proficiency in Olympiad Mathematicscited by 22
  21. 2025PairJudge RM: Perform Best-of-N Sampling with Knockout Tournamentcited by 21
  22. 2025Solving Inequality Proofs with Large Language Modelscited by 21
  23. 2024Language Models as Science Tutorscited by 17
  24. 2024Importance Weighting Can Help Large Language Models Self-Improvecited by 11
  25. 2025Right Is Not Enough: The Pitfalls of Outcome Supervision in Training LLMs for Math Reasoningcited by 9
  26. 2024Autograding Mathematical Induction Proofs with Natural Language Processingcited by 4
  27. 2024Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluationcited by 3
  28. 2025Language Models are Few-Shot Graderscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 11; 2026: 16.

27 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025DeepSeekMath-V2: Towards Self-Verifiable Mathematical Reasoningcited by 84
  2. 2025Hilbert: Recursively Building Formal Proofs with Informal Reasoningcited by 55
  3. 2025BrokenMath: A Benchmark for Sycophancy in Theorem Proving with LLMscited by 23
  4. 2025Reliable Fine-Grained Evaluation of Natural Language Math Proofscited by 14
  5. 2025IMProofBench: Benchmarking AI on Research-Level Mathematical Proof Generationcited by 11
  6. 2025Scaling Generative Verifiers For Natural Language Mathematical Proof Verification And Selectioncited by 8
  7. 2025Towards Solving More Challenging IMO Problems via Decoupled Reasoning and Provingcited by 7
  8. 2026The Agentic Researcher: A Practical Guide to AI-Assisted Research in Mathematics and Machine Learningcited by 4
  9. 2025RefGrader: Automated Grading of Mathematical Competition Proofs using Agentic Workflowscited by 3
  10. 2026Bolzano: Case Studies in LLM-Assisted Mathematical Researchcited by 3
  11. 2026Not All Proofs Are Equal: Evaluating LLM Proof Quality Beyond Correctnesscited by 3
  12. 2026TCS-BENCH: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Generative AI Theoretical Computer Science Research Abilitycited by 3
15 more
  1. 2025The Mathematician's Assistant: Integrating AI into Research Practicecited by 2
  2. 2025Pessimistic Verification for Open Ended Math Questionscited by 2
  3. 2026QED-Nano: Teaching a Tiny Model to Prove Hard Theoremscited by 2
  4. 2025Putnam-like dataset summary: LLMs as mathematical competition contestantscited by 1
  5. 2026ProofVerifier: A Scalable, Diversity-Driven Framework for Natural-Language Proof Verificationcited by 1
  6. 2026STAR-P'olyaMath: Multi-Agent Reasoning under Persistent Meta-Strategic Supervisioncited by 1
  7. 2026Human vs Machine Mathematical Difficulty on Project Euler: An Experimental Analysiscited by 1
  8. 2026Efficient Test-Time Optimization for Multi-Agent Proof Autoformalizationcited by 1
  9. 2026Cost-Effective Automated Judging of Natural-Language Mathematical Proofscited by 1
  10. 2026Reliable Use of Lemmas via Eligibility Reasoning and Section-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  11. 2026Just Type It in Isabelle! AI Agents Drafting, Mechanizing, and Generalizing from Human Hintscited by 0
  12. 2026AdvancedMathBench: A Benchmark Suite for Advanced Mathematical Proof Generation and Verificationcited by 0
  13. 2026Reasoning Errors Have a Region and a Direction in the Residual-Stream Trajectory of LLMscited by 0
  14. 2026PCFBench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Product Carbon Footprint Estimationcited by 0
  15. 2026TCSAlgBench: Benchmarking Automated Proving for Research-Level Theoretical Computer Sciencecited by 0