mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Characterization and Mitigation of Training Instabilities in Microscaling Formats

arXiv 2506.20752 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.ARcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training large language models is an expensive, compute-bound process that must be repeated as models scale, algorithms improve, and new data is collected. To address this, next-generation hardware accelerators increasingly support lower-precision arithmetic formats, such as the Microscaling (MX) formats introduced in NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture. These formats use a shared scale within blocks of parameters to extend representable range and perform forward/backward GEMM operations in reduced precision for efficiency gains. In this work, we investigate the challenges and viability of block-scaled precision formats during model training. Across nearly one thousand language models trained from scratch -- spanning compute budgets from 2 × 1017 to 4.8 × 1019 FLOPs and sweeping over a broad range of weight-activation precision combinations -- we consistently observe that training in MX formats exhibits sharp, stochastic instabilities in the loss, particularly at larger compute scales. To explain this phenomenon, we conduct controlled experiments and ablations on a smaller proxy model that exhibits similar behavior as the language model, sweeping across architectural settings, hyperparameters, and precision formats. These experiments motivate a simple model in which multiplicative gradient bias introduced by the quantization of layer-norm affine parameters and a small fraction of activations can trigger runaway divergence. Through in situ intervention experiments on our proxy model, we demonstrate that instabilities can be averted or delayed by modifying precision schemes mid-training. Guided by these findings, we evaluate stabilization strategies in the LLM setting and show that certain hybrid configurations recover performance competitive with full-precision training. We release our code at https://github.com/Hither1/systems-scaling.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.

Builds on

36 of 44 references.

References · 36

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  4. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  5. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  6. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  7. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
  8. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  9. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
  10. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
  11. 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
  12. 2023OmniQuant: Omnidirectionally Calibrated Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 424
24 more
  1. 2022ST-MoE: Designing Stable and Transferable Sparse Expert Modelscited by 399
  2. 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 294
  3. 2020Query-Key Normalization for Transformerscited by 280
  4. 2022The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Lawscited by 251
  5. 2022FP8 Formats for Deep Learningcited by 196
  6. 2023Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiescited by 183
  7. 2022Self-Stabilization: The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 155
  8. 2023Microscaling Data Formats for Deep Learningcited by 152
  9. 2023Quantizable Transformers: Removing Outliers by Helping Attention Heads Do Nothingcited by 151
  10. 2020The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networkscited by 150
  11. 2024Simple and Scalable Strategies to Continually Pre-train Large Language Modelscited by 127
  12. 2024Scaling Laws for Precisioncited by 95
  13. 2024Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Modelscited by 88
  14. 2024Scaling FP8 training to trillion-token LLMscited by 65
  15. 2025Command A: An Enterprise-Ready Large Language Modelcited by 59
  16. 2023A Theory on Adam Instability in Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 56
  17. 2025ParetoQ: Improving Scaling Laws in Extremely Low-bit LLM Quantizationcited by 46
  18. 2025Training LLMs with MXFP4cited by 37
  19. 2021Pareto-Optimal Quantized ResNet Is Mostly 4-bitcited by 26
  20. 2024Low-Bit Quantization Favors Undertrained LLMs: Scaling Laws for Quantized LLMs with 100T Training Tokenscited by 18
  21. 2025Scaling Law for Quantization-Aware Trainingcited by 17
  22. 2024Loss-to-Loss Prediction: Scaling Laws for All Datasetscited by 15
  23. 2025Understanding Silent Data Corruption in LLM Trainingcited by 15
  24. 2024To FP8 and Back Again: Quantifying Reduced Precision Effects on LLM Training Stabilitycited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Is Finer Better? The Limits of Microscaling Formats in Large Language Models
  2. 2025Recipes for Pre-training LLMs with MXFP8
  3. 2026Finer is Better (with the Right Scaling)
  4. 2026UE5M3 FP4 Block Scaling for Stable Language Model Pretraining
  5. 2025MX+: Pushing the Limits of Microscaling Formats for Efficient Large Language Model Serving
  6. 2025MicroMix: Efficient Mixed-Precision Quantization with Microscaling Formats for Large Language Models
  7. 2026Heterogeneity-Aware Microscaling for Efficient Low-Bit LLM Inference
  8. 2026Unveiling the Potential of Quantization with MXFP4: Strategies for Quantization Error Reduction