mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hear No Evil: Detecting Gradient Leakage by Malicious Servers in Federated Learning

arXiv 2506.20651 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.CR cs.DCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has shown that gradient updates in federated learning (FL) can unintentionally reveal sensitive information about a client's local data. This risk becomes significantly greater when a malicious server manipulates the global model to provoke information-rich updates from clients. In this paper, we adopt a defender's perspective to provide the first comprehensive analysis of malicious gradient leakage attacks and the model manipulation techniques that enable them. Our investigation reveals a core trade-off: these attacks cannot be both highly effective in reconstructing private data and sufficiently stealthy to evade detection -- especially in realistic FL settings that incorporate common normalization techniques and federated averaging. Building on this insight, we argue that malicious gradient leakage attacks, while theoretically concerning, are inherently limited in practice and often detectable through basic monitoring. As a complementary contribution, we propose a simple, lightweight, and broadly applicable client-side detection mechanism that flags suspicious model updates before local training begins, despite the fact that such detection may not be strictly necessary in realistic FL settings. This mechanism further underscores the feasibility of defending against these attacks with minimal overhead, offering a deployable safeguard for privacy-conscious federated learning systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.

Builds on

36 of 50 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  5. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  8. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  9. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  10. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
  11. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,198
  12. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
24 more
  1. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
  2. 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
  3. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
  4. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  5. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  6. 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
  7. 2015Federated Optimization:Distributed Optimization Beyond the Datacentercited by 195
  8. 2020LDP-Fed: Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 132
  9. 2017Batch Renormalization: Towards Reducing Minibatch Dependence in Batch-Normalized Modelscited by 128
  10. 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
  11. 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 108
  12. 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
  13. 2020Provable Defense against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning from Representation Perspectivecited by 94
  14. 2022Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnificationcited by 73
  15. 2022Recovering Private Text in Federated Learning of Language Modelscited by 70
  16. 2021Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model Inconsistencycited by 67
  17. 2021TAG: Gradient Attack on Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 63
  18. 2022LAMP: Extracting Text from Gradients with Language Model Priorscited by 54
  19. 2022Decepticons: Corrupted Transformers Breach Privacy in Federated Learning for Language Modelscited by 53
  20. 2023LOKI: Large-scale Data Reconstruction Attack against Federated Learning through Model Manipulationcited by 36
  21. 2022Learning to Invert: Simple Adaptive Attacks for Gradient Inversion in Federated Learningcited by 30
  22. 2021APRIL: Finding the Achilles' Heel on Privacy for Vision Transformerscited by 24
  23. 2022Rethinking Normalization Methods in Federated Learningcited by 19
  24. 2023Reconstructing Individual Data Points in Federated Learning Hardened with Differential Privacy and Secure Aggregationcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.