On the Detectability of Active Gradient Inversion Attacks in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of the key advantages of Federated Learning (FL) is its ability to collaboratively train a Machine Learning (ML) model while keeping clients' data on-site. However, this can create a false sense of security. Despite not sharing private data increases the overall privacy, prior studies have shown that gradients exchanged during the FL training remain vulnerable to Gradient Inversion Attacks (GIAs). These attacks allow reconstructing the clients' local data, breaking the privacy promise of FL. GIAs can be launched by either a passive or an active server. In the latter case, a malicious server manipulates the global model to facilitate data reconstruction. While effective, earlier attacks falling under this category have been demonstrated to be detectable by clients, limiting their real-world applicability. Recently, novel active GIAs have emerged, claiming to be far stealthier than previous approaches. This work provides the first comprehensive analysis of these claims, investigating four state-of-the-art GIAs. We propose novel lightweight client-side detection techniques, based on statistically improbable weight structures and anomalous loss and gradient dynamics. Extensive evaluation across several configurations demonstrates that our methods enable clients to effectively detect active GIAs without any modifications to the FL training protocol.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.
Builds on
23 of 44 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2020Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Frameworkcited by 455
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
- 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 125
- 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 108
- 2022Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnificationcited by 73
11 more
- 2020When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlookcited by 68
- 2023LOKI: Large-scale Data Reconstruction Attack against Federated Learning through Model Manipulationcited by 36
- 2023Scale-MIA: A Scalable Model Inversion Attack against Secure Federated Learning via Latent Space Reconstructioncited by 21
- 2023Zero-Knowledge Proof-based Verifiable Decentralized Machine Learning in Communication Network: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 18
- 2023Reconstructing Individual Data Points in Federated Learning Hardened with Differential Privacy and Secure Aggregationcited by 16
- 2024SoK: On Gradient Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 12
- 2023Hiding in Plain Sight: Disguising Data Stealing Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2023Maximum Knowledge Orthogonality Reconstruction with Gradients in Federated Learningcited by 4
- 2024Geminio: Language-Guided Gradient Inversion Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2023Attacking Byzantine Robust Aggregation in High Dimensionscited by 1
- 2025Hear No Evil: Detecting Gradient Leakage by Malicious Servers in Federated Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.