When Can We Reuse a Calibration Set for Multiple Conformal Predictions?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable uncertainty quantification is crucial for the trustworthiness of machine learning applications. Inductive Conformal Prediction (ICP) offers a distribution-free framework for generating prediction sets or intervals with user-specified confidence. However, standard ICP guarantees are marginal and typically require a fresh calibration set for each new prediction to maintain their validity. This paper addresses this practical limitation by demonstrating how e-conformal prediction, in conjunction with Hoeffding's inequality, can enable the repeated use of a single calibration set with a high probability of preserving the desired coverage. Through a case study on the CIFAR-10 dataset, we train a deep neural network and utilise a calibration set to estimate a Hoeffding correction. This correction allows us to apply a modified Markov's inequality, leading to the construction of prediction sets with quantifiable confidence. Our results illustrate the feasibility of maintaining provable performance in conformal prediction while enhancing its practicality by reducing the need for repeated calibration. The code for this work is publicly available.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.
Builds on
3 of 8 references.
References · 3
- 2020Conformal Prediction: a Unified Review of Theory and New Challengescited by 118
- 2025E-Values Expand the Scope of Conformal Predictioncited by 26
- 2024Enhancing Conformal Prediction Using E-Test Statisticscited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Replicable Conformal Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Replicable Conformal Prediction23 Aug 2026