mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

General Methods Make Great Domain-specific Foundation Models: A Case-study on Fetal Ultrasound

arXiv 2506.19552 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With access to large-scale, unlabeled medical datasets, researchers are confronted with two questions: Should they attempt to pretrain a custom foundation model on this medical data, or use transfer-learning from an existing generalist model? And, if a custom model is pretrained, are novel methods required? In this paper we explore these questions by conducting a case-study, in which we train a foundation model on a large regional fetal ultrasound dataset of 2M images. By selecting the well-established DINOv2 method for pretraining, we achieve state-of-the-art results on three fetal ultrasound datasets, covering data from different countries, classification, segmentation, and few-shot tasks. We compare against a series of models pretrained on natural images, ultrasound images, and supervised baselines. Our results demonstrate two key insights: (i) Pretraining on custom data is worth it, even if smaller models are trained on less data, as scaling in natural image pretraining does not translate to ultrasound performance. (ii) Well-tuned methods from computer vision are making it feasible to train custom foundation models for a given medical domain, requiring no hyperparameter tuning and little methodological adaptation. Given these findings, we argue that a bias towards methodological innovation should be avoided when developing domain specific foundation models under common computational resource constraints.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.

Builds on

20 of 28 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  7. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  8. 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,424
  9. 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
  10. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 954
  11. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 891
  12. 2023BiomedCLIP: a multimodal biomedical foundation model pretrained from fifteen million scientific image-text pairscited by 506
8 more
  1. 2019MultiResUNet : Rethinking the U-Net Architecture for Multimodal Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 195
  2. 2023Towards Generalist Foundation Model for Radiology by Leveraging Web-scale 2D&3D Medical Datacited by 176
  3. 2023USFM: A Universal Ultrasound Foundation Model Generalized to Tasks and Organs towards Label Efficient Image Analysiscited by 64
  4. 2023Are Natural Domain Foundation Models Useful for Medical Image Classification?cited by 44
  5. 2024Revisiting MAE pre-training for 3D medical image segmentationcited by 33
  6. 2024From Pretraining to Privacy: Federated Ultrasound Foundation Model with Self-Supervised Learningcited by 14
  7. 2024General Purpose Image Encoder DINOv2 for Medical Image Registrationcited by 11
  8. 2024Source Matters: Source Dataset Impact on Model Robustness in Medical Imagingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.