mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring Efficient Quantification of Modeling Uncertainties with Differentiable Physics-Informed Machine Learning Architectures

arXiv 2506.18247 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantifying and propagating modeling uncertainties is crucial for reliability analysis, robust optimization, and other model-based algorithmic processes in engineering design and control. Now, physics-informed machine learning (PIML) methods have emerged in recent years as a new alternative to traditional computational modeling and surrogate modeling methods, offering a balance between computing efficiency, modeling accuracy, and interpretability. However, their ability to predict and propagate modeling uncertainties remains mostly unexplored. In this paper, a promising class of auto-differentiable hybrid PIML architectures that combine partial physics and neural networks or ANNs (for input transformation or adaptive parameter estimation) is integrated with Bayesian Neural networks (replacing the ANNs); this is done with the goal to explore whether BNNs can successfully provision uncertainty propagation capabilities in the PIML architectures as well, further supported by the auto-differentiability of these architectures. A two-stage training process is used to alleviate the challenges traditionally encountered in training probabilistic ML models. The resulting BNN-integrated PIML architecture is evaluated on an analytical benchmark problem and flight experiments data for a fixed-wing RC aircraft, with prediction performance observed to be slightly worse or at par with purely data-driven ML and original PIML models. Moreover, Monte Carlo sampling of probabilistic BNN weights was found to be most effective in propagating uncertainty in the BNN-integrated PIML architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.

Builds on

14 of 43 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  4. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  5. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
  6. 2017Physics-guided Neural Networks (PGNN): An Application in Lake Temperature Modelingcited by 131
  7. 2020Bayesian Neural Networks: An Introduction and Surveycited by 131
  8. 2022Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Regression Generalizes Linear PDE Solverscited by 41
  9. 2020Modern Monte Carlo Methods for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation: A Surveycited by 21
  10. 2017Uncertainty Decomposition in Bayesian Neural Networks with Latent Variablescited by 9
  11. 2022Physics-informed Neural Networks with Periodic Activation Functions for Solute Transport in Heterogeneous Porous Mediacited by 8
  12. 2021Data-driven method for real-time prediction and uncertainty quantification of fatigue failure under stochastic loading using artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regressioncited by 4
2 more
  1. 2024Physics-Informed Machine Learning Towards A Real-Time Spacecraft Thermal Simulatorcited by 2
  2. 2023Physics-Infused Machine Learning Based Prediction of VTOL Aerodynamics with Sparse Datasetscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.