Data-driven method for real-time prediction and uncertainty quantification of fatigue failure under stochastic loading using artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Various engineering systems such as naval and aerial vehicles, offshore structures, and mechanical components of motorized systems, are exposed to fatigue failures due to stochastic loadings. Methods for early failure prediction are essential for engineering, military, and civil applications. In addition to the prediction of time to failure (TtF), uncertainty quantification (UQ) is of major importance for real-time decision-making purposes. Usually, time domain or frequency domain methods are used for fatigue prediction, such as rainflow counting and Miner's rule or Dirlik's method. However, those methods suffer from over-simplistic modeling and inaccurate failure predictions under stochastic loadings. During the last years, several data-driven models were suggested for offline fatigue failure. However, most of them are not capable of both accurate real-time fatigue prediction and UQ. In the current work, a probabilistic data-driven model is introduced. A hybrid architecture of a fully-connected artificial neural network (FC-ANN) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) is proposed to ensure enhanced predictive abilities and simultaneous UQ of the predicted TtF. The real-time prediction and UQ performances of the suggested model are validated using both synthetic and experimental data. This novel hybrid method is fully data-driven and extends the forecasting capabilities of existing time-domain and machine learning-based methods for fatigue prediction. It paves the way towards the development of a preventive system that provides real-time safety and operational instructions and insights for structural health monitoring (SHM) purposes, allowing prevention of environmental damage, and loss of human lives.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2021.
Builds on
2 of 44 references.
References · 2
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019Toward quantitative fractography using convolutional neural networkscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.
4 papers.
- 2022A Review of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Structural Dynamics and Vibroacousticcited by 7
- 2025Exploring Efficient Quantification of Modeling Uncertainties with Differentiable Physics-Informed Machine Learning Architecturescited by 1
- 2025Confidence Adjusted Surprise Measure for Active Resourceful Trials (CA-SMART): A Data-driven Active Learning Framework for Accelerating Material Discovery under Resource Constraintscited by 0
- 2025Comparison of Deterministic and Probabilistic Machine Learning Algorithms for Precise Dimensional Control and Uncertainty Quantification in Additive Manufacturingcited by 0
- 2025Comparison of Deterministic and Probabilistic Machine Learning Algorithms for Precise Dimensional Control and Uncertainty Quantification in Additive Manufacturing15 Sep 2025
- 2025Exploring Efficient Quantification of Modeling Uncertainties with Differentiable Physics-Informed Machine Learning Architectures23 Jun 2025
- 2025Confidence Adjusted Surprise Measure for Active Resourceful Trials (CA-SMART): A Data-driven Active Learning Framework for Accelerating Material Discovery under Resource Constraints27 Mar 2025
- 2022A Review of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Structural Dynamics and Vibroacoustic13 Apr 2022