Improving Mixup Calibration with Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many real-world applications, ensuring the robustness and stability of deep neural networks (DNNs) is crucial, particularly for image classification tasks that encounter various input perturbations. While Mixup-based data augmentation techniques have been widely adopted to enhance the resilience of trained models against such perturbations, our experiments reveal an important corruption robustness-calibration trade-off: stronger Mixup-based augmentation can improve robustness against corrupted data while substantially increasing expected calibration error (ECE). To address this challenge, we introduce DRO-Augment, a framework that integrates Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization (W-DRO) with various Mixup-based data augmentation strategies to mitigate this trade-off. Our method substantially reduces ECE under strong Mixup-based augmentation while largely preserving corruption accuracy across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, CIFAR-10-C, and CIFAR-100-C. On the theoretical side, we establish novel generalization error bounds for neural networks trained using a variation-regularized loss function with augmented data, closely related to the W-DRO problem. Furthermore, we introduce a refined CIFAR-C benchmark that corrects inconsistencies in corruption intensities, providing a more reliable evaluation for future robustness research.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2025.
Builds on
27 of 44 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2015Listen, Attend and Spellcited by 543
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 433
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 305
15 more
- 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 291
- 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
- 2016Improving the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks via Stability Trainingcited by 156
- 2015Distributionally Robust Logistic Regressioncited by 126
- 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 60
- 2018Motivating the Rules of the Game for Adversarial Example Researchcited by 57
- 2022Simultaneous approximation of a smooth function and its derivatives by deep neural networks with piecewise-polynomial activationscited by 29
- 2019Confidence Regions in Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Estimationcited by 24
- 2022NoisyMix: Boosting Model Robustness to Common Corruptionscited by 17
- 2023Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networkscited by 16
- 2023Deep Neural Networks for Nonparametric Interaction Models with Diverging Dimensioncited by 15
- 2020Adversarial Classification via Distributional Robustness with Wasserstein Ambiguitycited by 8
- 2023What Are Effective Labels for Augmented Data? Improving Calibration and Robustness with AutoLabelcited by 6
- 2023Tailoring Mixup to Data for Calibrationcited by 5
- 2021Distributionally Robust Multiclass Classification and Applications in Deep Image Classifierscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Unification and Optimization of Robust Supervised Learning27 May 2026