mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What Are Effective Labels for Augmented Data? Improving Calibration and Robustness with AutoLabel

arXiv 2302.11188 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A wide breadth of research has devised data augmentation approaches that can improve both accuracy and generalization performance for neural networks. However, augmented data can end up being far from the clean training data and what is the appropriate label is less clear. Despite this, most existing work simply uses one-hot labels for augmented data. In this paper, we show re-using one-hot labels for highly distorted data might run the risk of adding noise and degrading accuracy and calibration. To mitigate this, we propose a generic method AutoLabel to automatically learn the confidence in the labels for augmented data, based on the transformation distance between the clean distribution and augmented distribution. AutoLabel is built on label smoothing and is guided by the calibration-performance over a hold-out validation set. We successfully apply AutoLabel to three different data augmentation techniques: the state-of-the-art RandAug, AugMix, and adversarial training. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet show that AutoLabel significantly improves existing data augmentation techniques over models' calibration and accuracy, especially under distributional shift.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2023.

Builds on

31 of 36 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  8. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  9. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  10. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  11. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  12. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
19 more
  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  2. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  3. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  4. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  5. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  6. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  7. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  8. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  9. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  10. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  11. 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 489
  12. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  13. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
  14. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
  15. 2019Improving Robustness Without Sacrificing Accuracy with Patch Gaussian Augmentationcited by 105
  16. 2018Data Augmentation using Random Image Cropping and Patching for Deep CNNscited by 87
  17. 2019Detecting and Diagnosing Adversarial Images with Class-Conditional Capsule Reconstructionscited by 30
  18. 2020Improving Calibration through the Relationship with Adversarial Robustnesscited by 26
  19. 2020Deflecting Adversarial Attackscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.