Out of Control -- Why Alignment Needs Formal Control Theory (and an Alignment Control Stack)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This position paper argues that formal optimal control theory should be central to AI alignment research, offering a distinct perspective from prevailing AI safety and security approaches. While recent work in AI safety and mechanistic interpretability has advanced formal methods for alignment, they often fall short of the generalisation required of control frameworks for other technologies. There is also a lack of research into how to render different alignment/control protocols interoperable. We argue that by recasting alignment through principles of formal optimal control and framing alignment in terms of hierarchical stack from physical to socio-technical layers according to which controls may be applied we can develop a better understanding of the potential and limitations for controlling frontier models and agentic AI systems. To this end, we introduce an Alignment Control Stack which sets out a hierarchical layered alignment stack, identifying measurement and control characteristics at each layer and how different layers are formally interoperable. We argue that such analysis is also key to the assurances that will be needed by governments and regulators in order to see AI technologies sustainably benefit the community. Our position is that doing so will bridge the well-established and empirically validated methods of optimal control with practical deployment considerations to create a more comprehensive alignment framework, enhancing how we approach safety and reliability for advanced AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2025.
Builds on
36 of 57 references.
References · 36
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,055
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
- 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 451
24 more
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 449
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 447
- 2018AI safety via debatecited by 400
- 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 328
- 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 300
- 2019Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systemscited by 258
- 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 258
- 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 229
- 2022Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Modelscited by 225
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
- 2025Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMscited by 172
- 2019Optimal Policies Tend to Seek Powercited by 119
- 2021Truthful AI: Developing and governing AI that does not liecited by 113
- 2022Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?cited by 105
- 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systemscited by 96
- 2021Consequences of Misaligned AIcited by 80
- 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 78
- 2017CycleGAN, a Master of Steganographycited by 65
- 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 55
- 2023Debate Helps Supervise Unreliable Expertscited by 43
- 2025A sketch of an AI control safety casecited by 39
- 2024Adaptive Deployment of Untrusted LLMs Reduces Distributed Threatscited by 31
- 2019A Research Agenda: Dynamic Models to Defend Against Correlated Attackscited by 18
- 2024Subversion Strategy Eval: Can language models statelessly strategize to subvert control protocols?cited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Institutional AI: A Governance Framework for Distributional AGI Safety
- 2026Alignment as Institutional Design: From Behavioral Correction to Transaction Structure in Intelligent Systems
- 2025Alignment, Agency and Autonomy in Frontier AI: A Systems Engineering Perspective
- 2026Position: AI Safety Requires Effective Controllability
- 2025The Oversight Game: Learning to Cooperatively Balance an AI Agent's Safety and Autonomy
- 2024Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks
- 2025Towards Integrated Alignment
- 2026Automated alignment is harder than you think