Towards Measurement Theory for Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We motivate and outline a programme for a formal theory of measurement of artificial intelligence. We argue that formalising measurement for AI will allow researchers, practitioners, and regulators to: (i) make comparisons between systems and the evaluation methods applied to them; (ii) connect frontier AI evaluations with established quantitative risk analysis techniques drawn from engineering and safety science; and (iii) foreground how what counts as AI capability is contingent upon the measurement operations and scales we elect to use. We sketch a layered measurement stack, distinguish direct from indirect observables, and signpost how these ingredients provide a pathway toward a unified, calibratable taxonomy of AI phenomena.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.
Builds on
6 of 35 references.
References · 6
- 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 229
- 2023Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?cited by 97
- 2025Infrastructure for AI Agentscited by 41
- 2025A sketch of an AI control safety casecited by 39
- 2024Centaur: a foundation model of human cognitioncited by 36
- 2025Out of Control -- Why Alignment Needs Formal Control Theory (and an Alignment Control Stack)cited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.