mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Measurement Theory for Artificial Intelligence

arXiv 2507.05587 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We motivate and outline a programme for a formal theory of measurement of artificial intelligence. We argue that formalising measurement for AI will allow researchers, practitioners, and regulators to: (i) make comparisons between systems and the evaluation methods applied to them; (ii) connect frontier AI evaluations with established quantitative risk analysis techniques drawn from engineering and safety science; and (iii) foreground how what counts as AI capability is contingent upon the measurement operations and scales we elect to use. We sketch a layered measurement stack, distinguish direct from indirect observables, and signpost how these ingredients provide a pathway toward a unified, calibratable taxonomy of AI phenomena.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

Builds on

6 of 35 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 229
  2. 2023Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?cited by 97
  3. 2025Infrastructure for AI Agentscited by 41
  4. 2025A sketch of an AI control safety casecited by 39
  5. 2024Centaur: a foundation model of human cognitioncited by 36
  6. 2025Out of Control -- Why Alignment Needs Formal Control Theory (and an Alignment Control Stack)cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.