mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Flatness After All?

arXiv 2506.17809 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent literature generalization in deep learning has examined the relationship between the curvature of the loss function at minima and generalization, mainly in the context of overparameterized neural networks. A key observation is that "flat" minima tend to generalize better than "sharp" minima. While this idea is supported by empirical evidence, it has also been shown that deep networks can generalize even with arbitrary sharpness, as measured by either the trace or the spectral norm of the Hessian. In this paper, we argue that generalization could be assessed by measuring flatness using a soft rank measure of the Hessian. We show that when an exponential family neural network model is exactly calibrated, and its prediction error and its confidence on the prediction are not correlated with the first and the second derivative of the network's output, our measure accurately captures the asymptotic expected generalization gap. For non-calibrated models, we connect a soft rank based flatness measure to the well-known Takeuchi Information Criterion and show that it still provides reliable estimates of generalization gaps for models that are not overly confident. Experimental results indicate that our approach offers a robust estimate of the generalization gap compared to baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2025.

Builds on

21 of 43 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  2. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 466
  3. 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 443
  4. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 405
  5. 2019Limitations of the Empirical Fisher Approximation for Natural Gradient Descentcited by 217
  6. 2021On Feature Decorrelation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 160
  7. 2021The Low-Rank Simplicity Bias in Deep Networkscited by 154
  8. 2020Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by Normscited by 119
  9. 2021Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learningcited by 106
  10. 2014Stochastic Compositional Gradient Descent: Algorithms for Minimizing Compositions of Expected-Value Functionscited by 95
  11. 2015Reducing Overfitting in Deep Networks by Decorrelating Representationscited by 94
  12. 2023A Modern Look at the Relationship between Sharpness and Generalizationcited by 92
9 more
  1. 2020Relative Flatness and Generalizationcited by 88
  2. 2022Same Pre-training Loss, Better Downstream: Implicit Bias Matters for Language Modelscited by 84
  3. 2019On the interplay between noise and curvature and its effect on optimization and generalizationcited by 44
  4. 2022Invariance Learning in Deep Neural Networks with Differentiable Laplace Approximationscited by 42
  5. 2022Flat minima generalize for low-rank matrix recoverycited by 28
  6. 2023Fantastic Generalization Measures are Nowhere to be Foundcited by 19
  7. 2023The Geometry of Neural Nets' Parameter Spaces Under Reparametrizationcited by 16
  8. 2023Stochastic Marginal Likelihood Gradients using Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 10
  9. 2023On the Importance of Feature Decorrelation for Unsupervised Representation Learning in Reinforcement Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.