mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling

arXiv 2506.15498 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Process or step-wise supervision has played a crucial role in advancing complex multi-step reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, efficient, high-quality automated process annotation remains a significant challenge. To address this, we introduce Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation (SPARE), a novel structured framework that enables efficient per-step annotation by jointly aligning solution steps to reference solutions and determine its accuracy with explicit reasoning in single generation. We demonstrate SPARE's effectiveness across four diverse datasets spanning mathematical reasoning (GSM8K, MATH), multi-hop question answering (MuSiQue-Ans), and spatial reasoning (SpaRP), showing consistent improvements in two applications: (1) training Process Reward Models (PRMs) for ranking and aggregating multiple generations, and (2) fine-tuning models via offline reinforcement learning for greedy decoding. On ProcessBench, SPARE demonstrates data-efficient out-of-distribution generalization, using only ~16% of training samples compared to human-labeled and other synthetically trained baselines. Additionally, it achieves competitive performance with MCTS-based methods while offering 2.3× speedup in terms of total token count. Manual analysis reveals complementary precision-recall characteristics with MCTS approaches, suggesting potential for ensemble methods. These results establish SPARE as a practical and scalable solution for automatic process supervision in LLM reasoning.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

31 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Process Reward Models That Think23 Apr
  2. 2025R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling27 Mar
  3. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction27 Aug
  4. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search6 Jun
  5. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision5 Jun
  6. 2024Multi-step Problem Solving Through a Verifier: An Empirical Analysis on Model-induced Process Supervision5 Feb
  7. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  8. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  9. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov

Other references · 22

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  7. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  8. 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 916
  9. 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 861
  10. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 625
  11. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
  12. 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 446
10 more
  1. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 388
  2. 2023Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematicscited by 388
  3. 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifiercited by 233
  4. 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoningcited by 169
  5. 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferencescited by 130
  6. 2023OVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 85
  7. 2024FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMscited by 83
  8. 2023GRACE: Discriminator-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 35
  9. 2024AutoPRM: Automating Procedural Supervision for Multi-Step Reasoning via Controllable Question Decompositioncited by 24
  10. 2023Let's Reinforce Step by Stepcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Process Supervision for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Monte Carlo Net Information Gain
  2. 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
  3. 2025An Efficient and Precise Training Data Construction Framework for Process-supervised Reward Model in Mathematical Reasoning
  4. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning
  5. 2025GroundedPRM: Tree-Guided and Fidelity-Aware Process Reward Modeling for Step-Level Reasoning
  6. 2026Unsupervised Process Reward Models
  7. 2025SCOPE: Compress Mathematical Reasoning Steps for Efficient Automated Process Annotation
  8. 2025Efficient Process Reward Model Training via Active Learning