SCOPE: Compress Mathematical Reasoning Steps for Efficient Automated Process Annotation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Process Reward Models (PRMs) have demonstrated promising results in mathematical reasoning, but existing process annotation approaches, whether through human annotations or Monte Carlo simulations, remain computationally expensive. In this paper, we introduce Step COmpression for Process Estimation (SCOPE), a novel compression-based approach that significantly reduces annotation costs. We first translate natural language reasoning steps into code and normalize them through Abstract Syntax Tree, then merge equivalent steps to construct a prefix tree. Unlike simulation-based methods that waste numerous samples on estimation, SCOPE leverages a compression-based prefix tree where each root-to-leaf path serves as a training sample, reducing the complexity from O(NMK) to O(N). We construct a large-scale dataset containing 196K samples with only 5% of the computational resources required by previous methods. Empirical results demonstrate that PRMs trained on our dataset consistently outperform existing automated annotation approaches on both Best-of-N strategy and ProcessBench.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.
Builds on
25 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards3 Feb
- 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning9 Dec
- 2024Free Process Rewards without Process Labels2 Dec
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision5 Jun
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov
Other references · 18
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,141
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2022DeepSpeed Inference: Enabling Efficient Inference of Transformer Models at Unprecedented Scalecited by 407
6 more
- 2019Do NLP Models Know Numbers? Probing Numeracy in Embeddingscited by 159
- 2024MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 144
- 2024MARIO: MAth Reasoning with code Interpreter Output -- A Reproducible Pipelinecited by 81
- 2024AntiLeakBench: Preventing Data Contamination by Automatically Constructing Benchmarks with Updated Real-World Knowledgecited by 44
- 2024AKEW: Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wildcited by 36
- 2024Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?cited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026When Tokenization is Secretly Output Supervisioncited by 0
- 2026When Tokenization is Secretly Output Supervision1 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling
- 2025An Efficient and Precise Training Data Construction Framework for Process-supervised Reward Model in Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Uncertainty-Based Methods for Automated Process Reward Data Construction and Output Aggregation in Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Coarse-to-Fine Process Reward Modeling for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
- 2025From Mathematical Reasoning to Code: Generalization of Process Reward Models in Test-Time Scaling
- 2025GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative Reasoning