mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scientifically-Interpretable Reasoning Network (ScIReN): Discovering Hidden Relationships in the Carbon Cycle and Beyond

arXiv 2506.14054 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Soils have potential to mitigate climate change by sequestering carbon from the atmosphere, but the soil carbon cycle remains poorly understood. Scientists have developed process-based models of the soil carbon cycle based on existing knowledge, but they contain numerous unknown parameters and often fit observations poorly. On the other hand, neural networks can learn patterns from data, but do not respect known scientific laws, and are too opaque to reveal novel scientific relationships. We thus propose Scientifically-Interpretable Reasoning Network (ScIReN), a fully-transparent framework that combines interpretable neural and process-based reasoning. An interpretable encoder predicts scientifically-meaningful latent parameters, which are then passed through a differentiable process-based decoder to predict labeled output variables. While the process-based decoder enforces existing scientific knowledge, the encoder leverages Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (KANs) to reveal interpretable relationships between input features and latent parameters, using novel smoothness penalties to balance expressivity and simplicity. ScIReN also introduces a novel hard-sigmoid constraint layer to restrict latent parameters into prior ranges while maintaining interpretability. We apply ScIReN on two tasks: simulating the flow of organic carbon through soils, and modeling ecosystem respiration from plants. On both tasks, ScIReN outperforms or matches black-box models in predictive accuracy, while greatly improving scientific interpretability -- it can infer latent scientific mechanisms and their relationships with input features.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

Builds on

18 of 55 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  3. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  4. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  5. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 213
  6. 2017Physics-guided Neural Networks (PGNN): An Application in Lake Temperature Modelingcited by 131
  7. 2024KAN 2.0: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks Meet Sciencecited by 118
  8. 2024Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 113
  9. 2018Physics Guided RNNs for Modeling Dynamical Systems: A Case Study in Simulating Lake Temperature Profilescited by 55
  10. 2018A Simple and Effective Model-Based Variable Importance Measurecited by 51
  11. 2019Achieving Conservation of Energy in Neural Network Emulators for Climate Modelingcited by 28
  12. 2019Physics-Guided Architecture (PGA) of Neural Networks for Quantifying Uncertainty in Lake Temperature Modelingcited by 26
6 more
  1. 2020From calibration to parameter learning: Harnessing the scaling effects of big data in geoscientific modelingcited by 26
  2. 2022Differentiable, learnable, regionalized process-based models with physical outputs can approach state-of-the-art hydrologic prediction accuracycited by 21
  3. 2021Automating Crystal-Structure Phase Mapping: Combining Deep Learning with Constraint Reasoningcited by 9
  4. 2025Hybrid Phenology Modeling for Predicting Temperature Effects on Tree Dormancycited by 4
  5. 2024Causal hybrid modeling with double machine learningcited by 2
  6. 2022Monitoring Vegetation From Space at Extremely Fine Resolutions via Coarsely-Supervised Smooth U-Netcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.