mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Differentiable, learnable, regionalized process-based models with physical outputs can approach state-of-the-art hydrologic prediction accuracy

arXiv 2203.14827 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2022cs.LGcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predictions of hydrologic variables across the entire water cycle have significant value for water resource management as well as downstream applications such as ecosystem and water quality modeling. Recently, purely data-driven deep learning models like long short-term memory (LSTM) showed seemingly-insurmountable performance in modeling rainfall-runoff and other geoscientific variables, yet they cannot predict untrained physical variables and remain challenging to interpret. Here we show that differentiable, learnable, process-based models (called δ models here) can approach the performance level of LSTM for the intensively-observed variable (streamflow) with regionalized parameterization. We use a simple hydrologic model HBV as the backbone and use embedded neural networks, which can only be trained in a differentiable programming framework, to parameterize, enhance, or replace the process-based model modules. Without using an ensemble or post-processor, δ models can obtain a median Nash Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.732 for 671 basins across the USA for the Daymet forcing dataset, compared to 0.748 from a state-of-the-art LSTM model with the same setup. For another forcing dataset, the difference is even smaller: 0.715 vs. 0.722. Meanwhile, the resulting learnable process-based models can output a full set of untrained variables, e.g., soil and groundwater storage, snowpack, evapotranspiration, and baseflow, and later be constrained by their observations. Both simulated evapotranspiration and fraction of discharge from baseflow agreed decently with alternative estimates. The general framework can work with models with various process complexity and opens up the path for learning physics from big data.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2022.

Builds on

9 of 87 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  2. 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 345
  3. 2019Towards Learning Universal, Regional, and Local Hydrological Behaviors via Machine-Learning Applied to Large-Sample Datasetscited by 68
  4. 2017A trans-disciplinary review of deep learning research for water resources scientistscited by 47
  5. 2019Enhancing streamflow forecast and extracting insights using long-short term memory networks with data integration at continental scalescited by 27
  6. 2020From calibration to parameter learning: Harnessing the scaling effects of big data in geoscientific modelingcited by 26
  7. 2021The data synergy effects of time-series deep learning models in hydrologycited by 10
  8. 2020Prediction in ungauged regions with sparse flow duration curves and input-selection ensemble modelingcited by 9
  9. 2017Prolongation of SMAP to Spatio-temporally Seamless Coverage of Continental US Using a Deep Learning Neural Networkcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 6.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2025Sensitivity-Constrained Fourier Neural Operators for Forward and Inverse Problems in Parametric Differential Equationscited by 14
  2. 2024Knowledge-guided Machine Learning: Current Trends and Future Prospectscited by 13
  3. 2023Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrologycited by 11
  4. 2023Probing the limit of hydrologic predictability with the Transformer networkcited by 9
  5. 2023Time Series Predictions in Unmonitored Sites: A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques in Water Resourcescited by 6
  6. 2024Towards Interpretable Physical-Conceptual Catchment-Scale Hydrological Modeling using the Mass-Conserving-Perceptroncited by 4
  7. 2023Differentiable modeling to unify machine learning and physical models and advance Geosciencescited by 3
  8. 2024Using Machine Learning to Discover Parsimonious and Physically-Interpretable Representations of Catchment-Scale Rainfall-Runoff Dynamicscited by 3
  9. 2025A Deep State Space Model for Rainfall-Runoff Simulationscited by 3
  10. 2026HydroAgent: Closing the Gap Between Frontier LLMs and Human Experts in Hydrologic Model Calibration via Simulator-Grounded RLcited by 1
  11. 2023Learning Regionalization using Accurate Spatial Cost Gradients within a Differentiable High-Resolution Hydrological Model: Application to the French Mediterranean Regioncited by 0
  12. 2025Update hydrological states or meteorological forcings? Comparing data assimilation methods for differentiable hydrologic modelscited by 0
9 more
  1. 2025Distinct hydrologic response patterns and trends worldwide revealed by physics-embedded learningcited by 0
  2. 2025Scientifically-Interpretable Reasoning Network (ScIReN): Discovering Hidden Relationships in the Carbon Cycle and Beyondcited by 0
  3. 2025Physics-guided Emulators Reveal Resilience and Fragility under Operational Latencies and Outagescited by 0
  4. 2025Leveraging Exogenous Signals for Hydrology Time Series Forecastingcited by 0
  5. 2026Topology enables learning-based hydrodynamic prediction of the global river systemcited by 0
  6. 2026Process-Aware AI for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: A Mass-Conserving Neural Framework with Hydrological Process Constraintscited by 0
  7. 2026A Differentiable Framework for Global Circulation Model Precipitation Bias Correctioncited by 0
  8. 2026HydroAgent: Formalizing Forecaster Expertise into Skill-Orchestrated Flood Forecasting Workflowscited by 0
  9. 2026Hapi: A Multivariable Land-Surface Transformer for Medium-Range Hydrological Forecasting at Continental Scalecited by 0