mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hybrid Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

arXiv 2506.13680 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2025cs.LG stat.MEcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) from observational data involves modeling decisions that differ from supervised learning, particularly concerning how to regularize model complexity. Previous approaches can be grouped into two primary "meta-learner" paradigms that impose distinct inductive biases. Indirect meta-learners first fit and regularize separate potential outcome (PO) models and then estimate CATE by taking their difference, whereas direct meta-learners construct and directly regularize estimators for the CATE function itself. Neither approach consistently outperforms the other across all scenarios: indirect learners perform well when the PO functions are simple, while direct learners outperform when the CATE is simpler than individual PO functions. In this paper, we introduce the Hybrid Learner (H-learner), a novel regularization strategy that interpolates between the direct and indirect regularizations depending on the dataset at hand. The H-learner achieves this by learning intermediate functions whose difference closely approximates the CATE without necessarily requiring accurate individual approximations of the POs themselves. We demonstrate that intentionally allowing suboptimal fits to the POs improves the bias-variance tradeoff in estimating CATE. Experiments conducted on semi-synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets illustrate that the H-learner consistently operates at the Pareto frontier, effectively combining the strengths of both direct and indirect meta-learners.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

Builds on

14 of 24 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
  2. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 475
  3. 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 327
  4. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 285
  5. 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 254
  6. 2017Bayesian Inference of Individualized Treatment Effects using Multi-task Gaussian Processescited by 156
  7. 2021Nonparametric Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: From Theory to Learning Algorithmscited by 144
  8. 2017Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competitioncited by 106
  9. 2021Discussion on "Bayesian Regression Tree Models for Causal Inference: Regularization, Confounding, and Heterogeneous Effects" by Hahn, Murray and Carvalhocited by 77
  10. 2021On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 74
  11. 2022Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect Estimationcited by 25
  12. 2016Regularization and confounding in linear regression for treatment effect estimationcited by 12
2 more
  1. 2020Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 12
  2. 2022Comparison of meta-learners for estimating multi-valued treatment heterogeneous effectscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.