Intriguing Frequency Interpretation of Adversarial Robustness for CNNs and ViTs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial examples have attracted significant attention over the years, yet understanding their frequency-based characteristics remains insufficient. In this paper, we investigate the intriguing properties of adversarial examples in the frequency domain for the image classification task, with the following key findings. (1) As the high-frequency components increase, the performance gap between adversarial and natural examples becomes increasingly pronounced. (2) The model performance against filtered adversarial examples initially increases to a peak and declines to its inherent robustness. (3) In Convolutional Neural Networks, mid- and high-frequency components of adversarial examples exhibit their attack capabilities, while in Transformers, low- and mid-frequency components of adversarial examples are particularly effective. These results suggest that different network architectures have different frequency preferences and that differences in frequency components between adversarial and natural examples may directly influence model robustness. Based on our findings, we further conclude with three useful proposals that serve as a valuable reference to the AI model security community.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.
Builds on
30 of 34 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
18 more
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
- 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2020Focal Frequency Loss for Image Reconstruction and Synthesiscited by 206
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
- 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 152
- 2021SpectralDefense: Detecting Adversarial Attacks on CNNs in the Fourier Domaincited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.