mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Gender Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pain Detection

arXiv 2506.11132 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated pain detection through machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms holds significant potential in healthcare, particularly for patients unable to self-report pain levels. However, the accuracy and fairness of these algorithms across different demographic groups (e.g., gender) remain under-researched. This paper investigates the gender fairness of ML and DL models trained on the UNBC-McMaster Shoulder Pain Expression Archive Database, evaluating the performance of various models in detecting pain based solely on the visual modality of participants' facial expressions. We compare traditional ML algorithms, Linear Support Vector Machine (L SVM) and Radial Basis Function SVM (RBF SVM), with DL methods, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Vision Transformer (ViT), using a range of performance and fairness metrics. While ViT achieved the highest accuracy and a selection of fairness metrics, all models exhibited gender-based biases. These findings highlight the persistent trade-off between accuracy and fairness, emphasising the need for fairness-aware techniques to mitigate biases in automated healthcare systems.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.

Builds on

28 of 91 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  5. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  6. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  7. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
  8. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  9. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  10. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  11. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  12. 2020Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 294
16 more
  1. 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
  2. 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
  3. 2021Domain-Incremental Continual Learning for Mitigating Bias in Facial Expression and Action Unit Recognitioncited by 19
  4. 2022Potential sources of dataset bias complicate investigation of underdiagnosis by machine learning algorithmscited by 19
  5. 2023Uncertainty-based Fairness Measurescited by 15
  6. 2022To SMOTE, or not to SMOTE?cited by 14
  7. 2022Bias in Machine Learning Models Can Be Significantly Mitigated by Careful Training: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studiescited by 14
  8. 2022A Review of Speech-centric Trustworthy Machine Learning: Privacy, Safety, and Fairnesscited by 13
  9. 2025U-Fair: Uncertainty-based Multimodal Multitask Learning for Fairer Depression Detectioncited by 12
  10. 2024Small but Fair! Fairness for Multimodal Human-Human and Robot-Human Mental Wellbeing Coachingcited by 11
  11. 2017Personalized Automatic Estimation of Self-reported Pain Intensity from Facial Expressionscited by 9
  12. 2024Multimodal Gender Fairness in Depression Prediction: Insights on Data from the USA & Chinacited by 7
  13. 2025Machine Learning Fairness for Depression Detection using EEG Datacited by 7
  14. 2024Underneath the Numbers: Quantitative and Qualitative Gender Fairness in LLMs for Depression Predictioncited by 6
  15. 2023Navigating Fairness Measures and Trade-Offscited by 5
  16. 2023Detecting Visual Cues in the Intensive Care Unit and Association with Patient Clinical Statuscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.