mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting Visual Cues in the Intensive Care Unit and Association with Patient Clinical Status

arXiv 2311.00565 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intensive Care Units (ICU) provide close supervision and continuous care to patients with life-threatening conditions. However, continuous patient assessment in the ICU is still limited due to time constraints and the workload on healthcare providers. Existing patient assessments in the ICU such as pain or mobility assessment are mostly sporadic and administered manually, thus introducing the potential for human errors. Developing Artificial intelligence (AI) tools that can augment human assessments in the ICU can be beneficial for providing more objective and granular monitoring capabilities. For example, capturing the variations in a patient's facial cues related to pain or agitation can help in adjusting pain-related medications or detecting agitation-inducing conditions such as delirium. Additionally, subtle changes in visual cues during or prior to adverse clinical events could potentially aid in continuous patient monitoring when combined with high-resolution physiological signals and Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. In this paper, we examined the association between visual cues and patient condition including acuity status, acute brain dysfunction, and pain. We leveraged our AU-ICU dataset with 107,064 frames collected in the ICU annotated with facial action units (AUs) labels by trained annotators. We developed a new "masked loss computation" technique that addresses the data imbalance problem by maximizing data resource utilization. We trained the model using our AU-ICU dataset in conjunction with three external datasets to detect 18 AUs. The SWIN Transformer model achieved 0.57 mean F1-score and 0.89 mean accuracy on the test set. Additionally, we performed AU inference on 634,054 frames to evaluate the association between facial AUs and clinically important patient conditions such as acuity status, acute brain dysfunction, and pain.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

8 of 44 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
  5. 2020JhatAA-Net: Joint Facial Action Unit Detection and Face Alignment via Adaptive Attentioncited by 62
  6. 2023Computable Phenotypes to Characterize Changing Patient Brain Dysfunction in the Intensive Care Unitcited by 3
  7. 2018The Intelligent ICU Pilot Study: Using Artificial Intelligence Technology for Autonomous Patient Monitoringcited by 2
  8. 2022End-to-End Machine Learning Framework for Facial AU Detection in Intensive Care Unitscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.