Debiasing Online Preference Learning via Preference Feature Preservation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent preference learning frameworks for large language models (LLMs) simplify human preferences with binary pairwise comparisons and scalar rewards. This simplification could make LLMs' responses biased to mostly preferred features, and would be exacerbated during the iterations of online preference learning steps. To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework coined PFP (Preference Feature Preservation). The key idea of PFP is maintaining the distribution of human preference features and utilizing such rich signals throughout the online preference learning process. Specifically, PFP first extract preference features from offline pairwise human preference data and trains a feature classifier. Then, using trained classifier and the distribution preserving optimization, PFP maps appropriate preference features for a new input instruction during online learning. Lastly, PFP trains LLM using the existing preference learning method, by incorporating the preference feature into system prompts and enabling LLM to explicitly handle various human preferences. Our experiments demonstrate that PFP successfully mitigates the bias in preference features during online learning, and hence achieves superior performance compared to previous preference learning methods on standard benchmarks to evaluate LLM alignment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 30 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.
Builds on
30 of 53 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
- 2024Human Alignment of Large Language Models through Online Preference Optimisation13 Mar
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Loss27 Dec
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment1 Dec
Other references · 23
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
11 more
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
- 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 564
- 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 528
- 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
- 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 401
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 350
- 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 291
- 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignmentcited by 232
- 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 178
- 2020Distribution Aligning Refinery of Pseudo-label for Imbalanced Semi-supervised Learningcited by 105
- 2024Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalizationcited by 84
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2024A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models
- 2026From RLHF to Direct Alignment: A Theoretical Unification of Preference Learning for Large Language Models
- 2024Towards Improved Preference Optimization Pipeline: from Data Generation to Budget-Controlled Regularization
- 2026Nearly Optimal Active Preference Learning and Its Application to LLM Alignment
- 2026Spectral Souping: A Unified Framework for Online Preference Alignment
- 2025Latent Preference Coding: Aligning Large Language Models via Discrete Latent Codes
- 2023Compositional preference models for aligning LMs