Intra-Trajectory Consistency for Reward Modeling
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward models are critical for improving large language models (LLMs), particularly in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) or inference-time verification. Current reward modeling typically relies on scores of overall responses to learn the outcome rewards for the responses. However, since the response-level scores are coarse-grained supervision signals, the reward model struggles to identify the specific components within a response trajectory that truly correlate with the scores, leading to poor generalization on unseen responses. In this paper, we propose to leverage generation probabilities to establish reward consistency between processes in the response trajectory, which allows the response-level supervisory signal to propagate across processes, thereby providing additional fine-grained signals for reward learning. Building on analysis under the Bayesian framework, we develop an intra-trajectory consistency regularization to enforce that adjacent processes with higher next-token generation probability maintain more consistent rewards. We apply the proposed regularization to the advanced outcome reward model, improving its performance on RewardBench. Besides, we show that the reward model trained with the proposed regularization induces better DPO-aligned policies and achieves better best-of-N (BON) inference-time verification results. Our code is provided in https://github.com/chaoyang101/ICRM.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 44 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.
Builds on
44 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 14
Same direction, newest first
- 2024RRM: Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hacking20 Sep
- 2024Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMs14 Jun
- 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF13 May
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling20 Mar
- 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHF11 Feb
- 2024WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Models22 Jan
- 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling11 Jan
- 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hacking14 Dec
- 2023Loose lips sink ships: Mitigating Length Bias in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback8 Oct
- 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimization4 Oct
- 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training2 Jun
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
2 more
Other references · 30
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
18 more
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 656
- 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
- 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 504
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 472
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
- 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 344
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 279
- 2024Free Process Rewards without Process Labelscited by 165
- 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 135
- 2021A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classificationcited by 111
- 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankingscited by 80
- 2024GenARM: Reward Guided Generation with Autoregressive Reward Model for Test-time Alignmentcited by 54
- 2020CoDA: Contrast-enhanced and Diversity-promoting Data Augmentation for Natural Language Understandingcited by 41
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 36
- 2024Understanding the Learning Dynamics of Alignment with Human Feedbackcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective
- 2026Reward Models Are Secretly Value Functions: Temporally Coherent Reward Modeling
- 2026Gradient Regularization Mitigates Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback and Verifiable Rewards
- 2026Long-form RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Long-form Generation
- 2024Reward Generalization in RLHF: A Topological Perspective
- 2024Bayesian Reward Models for LLM Alignment
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Model Reward Learning under Heterogeneous Human Feedback
- 2025GRAM: A Generative Foundation Reward Model for Reward Generalization