Explainable Compliance Detection with Multi-Hop Natural Language Inference on Assurance Case Structure
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring complex systems meet regulations typically requires checking the validity of assurance cases through a claim-argument-evidence framework. Some challenges in this process include the complicated nature of legal and technical texts, the need for model explanations, and limited access to assurance case data. We propose a compliance detection approach based on Natural Language Inference (NLI): EXplainable CompLiance detection with Argumentative Inference of Multi-hop reasoning (EXCLAIM). We formulate the claim-argument-evidence structure of an assurance case as a multi-hop inference for explainable and traceable compliance detection. We address the limited number of assurance cases by generating them using large language models (LLMs). We introduce metrics that measure the coverage and structural consistency. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the generated assurance case from GDPR requirements in a multi-hop inference task as a case study. Our results highlight the potential of NLI-based approaches in automating the regulatory compliance process.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.
Builds on
26 of 51 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
14 more
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
- 2021Entailment as Few-Shot Learnercited by 123
- 2021Label Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero- and Few-Shot Relation Extractioncited by 73
- 2021"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classificationcited by 66
- 2023LeXFiles and LegalLAMA: Facilitating English Multinational Legal Language Model Developmentcited by 54
- 2022ferret: a Framework for Benchmarking Explainers on Transformerscited by 26
- 2021Relative Importance in Sentence Processingcited by 22
- 2022Do Transformer Models Show Similar Attention Patterns to Task-Specific Human Gaze?cited by 20
- 2022NLP-based Automated Compliance Checking of Data Processing Agreements against GDPRcited by 18
- 2024Lessons from the Use of Natural Language Inference (NLI) in Requirements Engineering Taskscited by 12
- 2021Cross-Policy Compliance Detection via Question Answeringcited by 7
- 2018Multi-hop Inference for Sentence-level TextGraphs: How Challenging is Meaningfully Combining Information for Science Question Answering?cited by 5
- 2023A Multi-solution Study on GDPR AI-enabled Completeness Checking of DPAscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Evaluating Assurance Cases as Text-Attributed Graphs for Structure and Provenance Analysiscited by 2
- 2026Cross-Domain Data Selection and Augmentation for Automatic Compliance Detectioncited by 0
- 2026An Agentic RAG and Evaluation Framework for Assurance Case Generation: Industrial Use Case for the EU Cyber Resilience Act Compliancecited by 0
- 2026Privacy Washing: Detecting Internal Contradictions in Privacy Policiescited by 0
- 2026Confidence Reasoning Graphs: Structured Confidence Estimation for LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026Confidence Reasoning Graphs: Structured Confidence Estimation for LLM Agents6 Oct 2026
- 2026Privacy Washing: Detecting Internal Contradictions in Privacy Policies2 Sep 2026
- 2026An Agentic RAG and Evaluation Framework for Assurance Case Generation: Industrial Use Case for the EU Cyber Resilience Act Compliance19 Aug 2026
- 2026Cross-Domain Data Selection and Augmentation for Automatic Compliance Detection23 Apr 2026
- 2026Evaluating Assurance Cases as Text-Attributed Graphs for Structure and Provenance Analysis22 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Code-as-Auditor: Executable Compliance Reasoning via Regulation-to-Code
- 2026ARCCS: An Automated Regulatory Compliance Checking System
- 2026CTRAG: An In-Context Retrieval-based Framework for Automated Compliance Checking using LLMs
- 2026Compliance-by-Construction Argument Graphs: Using Generative AI to Produce Evidence-Linked Formal Arguments for Certification-Grade Accountability
- 2025Scaling Policy Compliance Assessment in Language Models with Policy Reasoning Traces
- 2023Explainable Claim Verification via Knowledge-Grounded Reasoning with Large Language Models
- 2023Trusta: Reasoning about Assurance Cases with Formal Methods and Large Language Models
- 2026REGREACT: Self-Correcting Multi-Agent Pipelines for Structured Regulatory Information Extraction