mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unable to Forget: Proactive Interference Reveals Working Memory Limits in LLMs Beyond Context Length

arXiv 2506.08184 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AI q-bio.NCcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Information retrieval in Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly recognized as intertwined with generation capabilities rather than mere lookup. While longer contexts are often assumed to improve retrieval, the effects of intra-context interference remain understudied. To address this, we adapt the proactive interference (PI) paradigm from cognitive science, where earlier information disrupts recall of newer updates. In humans, susceptibility to such interference is inversely linked to working memory capacity. We introduce PI-LLM, an evaluation that sequentially streams semantically related key-value updates and queries only the final values. Although these final values are clearly positioned just before the query, LLM retrieval accuracy declines log-linearly toward zero as interference accumulates; errors arise from retrieving previously overwritten values. Attempts to mitigate interference via prompt engineering (e.g., instructing models to ignore earlier input) yield limited success. These findings reveal a fundamental constraint on LLMs' ability to disentangle interference and flexibly manipulate information, suggesting a working memory bottleneck beyond mere context access. This calls for approaches that strengthen models' ability to suppress irrelevant content during retrieval.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.

Builds on

4 of 14 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  2. 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 141
  3. 2024Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queriescited by 88
  4. 2023Working Memory Capacity of ChatGPT: An Empirical Studycited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 17.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026Large Language Model Reasoning Failurescited by 21
  2. 2025Sculptor: Empowering LLMs with Cognitive Agency via Active Context Managementcited by 18
  3. 2026COMI: Coarse-to-fine Context Compression via Marginal Information Gaincited by 13
  4. 2026Learning to Forget: Sleep-Inspired Memory Consolidation for Resolving Proactive Interference in Large Language Modelscited by 7
  5. 2025A Survey on AgentOps: Categorization, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 4
  6. 2026WMF-AM: Probing LLM Working Memory via Depth-Parameterized Cumulative State Trackingcited by 4
  7. 2025PISA: A Pragmatic Psych-Inspired Unified Memory System for Enhanced AI Agencycited by 3
  8. 2026SinkTrack: Attention Sink based Context Anchoring for Large Language Modelscited by 2
  9. 2026LLMs Remember First, Forget Last: Dual-Process Interference in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  10. 2026How Task Structure Limits Multi-Agent Success: An Information-Theoretic Analysiscited by 1
  11. 2026Compress and Forget: bitsandbytes Quantization Amplifies Proactive Interference in LLMscited by 1
  12. 2026A New Strategy for Artificial Intelligence: Training Foundation Models Directly on Human Brain Datacited by 0
8 more
  1. 2026Prompt Complexity Dilutes Structured Reasoning: A Follow-Up Study on the Car Wash Problemcited by 0
  2. 2026Agent System Operations: Categorization, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 0
  3. 2026Instruction Bleed: Cross-Module Interference in Prompt-Composed Agentic Systemscited by 0
  4. 2026The Sleeping Agent: What Gist-Based Context Compression Loses and Whycited by 0
  5. 2026Self-Cleaning and Captured Anyway: One Measured Primitive for Error in a Store an Agent Writes to Itself, and What a Falling Score Actually Measurescited by 0
  6. 2026In-Context Binding Capacity in Language Modelscited by 0
  7. 2026Positions Are Not Facts: The Mismatch Between KV Caches and Memorycited by 0
  8. 2026When Context Changes: Understanding Update Failures in LLMscited by 0