mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reflex First, Reflect Later: Latency-Aware Embodied LLM Agents for Dynamic Response

arXiv 2506.07223 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2025cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have substantially improved the planning capabilities of embodied agents, enabling their deployment in dynamic and safety-critical environments. However, these settings expose a critical limitation: inference latency. Delayed LLM responses can weaken real-time responsiveness and misalign agent reasoning with rapidly changing environmental states. This paper systematically studies the impact of inference latency on LLM-based embodied agents in dynamic environments. We introduce an FPS-based Time Conversion Mechanism (TCM) that maps inference time to elapsed simulation time, allowing computational delays to directly affect environmental evolution and agent outcomes. We instantiate this protocol in HAZARD and introduce Response Latency (RL) and Latency-to-Action Ratio (LAR) to evaluate agent responsiveness. Building on this framework, we propose the Rapid-Reflex Async-Reflect Agent (RRARA), which integrates rapid reflexive actions with asynchronous LLM reflection to mitigate latency-induced errors. We further introduce an LLM-based PrePlanner that generates cached object-centric subgoals, reducing repeated LLM calls while retaining the model's high-level reasoning capability. Experiments show that accounting for inference latency substantially changes embodied-agent performance and that RRARA achieves a stronger balance between decision quality and responsiveness.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2025.

Builds on

11 of 14 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents13 Feb
  2. 2024TANGO: Training-free Embodied AI Agents for Open-world Tasks5 Dec
  3. 2024Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making9 Oct

Other references · 8

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
  4. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,061
  5. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 783
  6. 2024HAZARD Challenge: Embodied Decision Making in Dynamically Changing Environmentscited by 32
  7. 2025Robotouille: An Asynchronous Planning Benchmark for LLM Agentscited by 32
  8. 2024EPO: Hierarchical LLM Agents with Environment Preference Optimizationcited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Assumptions to Actions: Turning LLM Reasoning into Uncertainty-Aware Planning for Embodied Agents
  2. 2026TypeGo: An OS Runtime for Embodied Agents
  3. 2023Plan, Eliminate, and Track -- Language Models are Good Teachers for Embodied Agents
  4. 2025Think, Act, Learn: A Framework for Autonomous Robotic Agents using Closed-Loop Large Language Models
  5. 2025Runaway is Ashamed, But Helpful: On the Early-Exit Behavior of Large Language Model-based Agents in Embodied Environments
  6. 2026Multi-Head Latent Control: A Unified Interface for LLM Agent Decision Making
  7. 2026RPMS: Enhancing LLM-Based Embodied Planning through Rule-Augmented Memory Synergy
  8. 2026From Language to Action: Can LLM-Based Agents Be Used for Embodied Robot Cognition?