mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarial Paraphrasing: A Universal Attack for Humanizing AI-Generated Text

arXiv 2506.07001 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have raised concerns about their misuse in AI-generated plagiarism and social engineering. While various AI-generated text detectors have been proposed to mitigate these risks, many remain vulnerable to simple evasion techniques such as paraphrasing. However, recent detectors have shown greater robustness against such basic attacks. In this work, we introduce Adversarial Paraphrasing, a training-free attack framework that universally humanizes any AI-generated text to evade detection more effectively. Our approach leverages an off-the-shelf instruction-following LLM to paraphrase AI-generated content under the guidance of an AI text detector, producing adversarial examples that are specifically optimized to bypass detection. Extensive experiments show that our attack is both broadly effective and highly transferable across several detection systems. For instance, compared to simple paraphrasing attack--which, ironically, increases the true positive at 1% false positive (T@1%F) by 8.57% on RADAR and 15.03% on Fast-DetectGPT--adversarial paraphrasing, guided by OpenAI-RoBERTa-Large, reduces T@1%F by 64.49% on RADAR and a striking 98.96% on Fast-DetectGPT. Across a diverse set of detectors--including neural network-based, watermark-based, and zero-shot approaches--our attack achieves an average T@1%F reduction of 87.88% under the guidance of OpenAI-RoBERTa-Large. We also analyze the tradeoff between text quality and attack success to find that our method can significantly reduce detection rates, with mostly a slight degradation in text quality. Our adversarial setup highlights the need for more robust and resilient detection strategies in the light of increasingly sophisticated evasion techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2025.

Builds on

27 of 36 references.

References · 27

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  5. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  6. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  7. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  8. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  9. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  10. 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 446
  11. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
  12. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
15 more
  1. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 320
  2. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 299
  3. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  4. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
  5. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
  6. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
  7. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 92
  8. 2024Fast Adversarial Attacks on Language Models In One GPU Minutecited by 88
  9. 2023Controlled Text Generation with Natural Language Instructionscited by 87
  10. 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Modelscited by 87
  11. 2023Robustness of AI-Image Detectors: Fundamental Limits and Practical Attackscited by 81
  12. 2024Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluationcited by 74
  13. 2024Controllable Text Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 57
  14. 2024Explaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluationscited by 49
  15. 2020CAT-Gen: Improving Robustness in NLP Models via Controlled Adversarial Text Generationcited by 44

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 11.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?
  2. 2024Finding a Needle in the Adversarial Haystack: A Targeted Paraphrasing Approach For Uncovering Edge Cases with Minimal Distribution Distortion
  3. 2026What the Eyes See, the LLMs Miss: Exploiting Human Perception for Adversarial Text Attacks
  4. 2024A Constraint-Enforcing Reward for Adversarial Attacks on Text Classifiers
  5. 2026MASH: Evading Black-Box AI-Generated Text Detectors via Style Humanization
  6. 2024DUPE: Detection Undermining via Prompt Engineering for Deepfake Text
  7. 2025AuthorMist: Evading AI Text Detectors with Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Detecting the Machine: A Comprehensive Benchmark of AI-Generated Text Detectors Across Architectures, Domains, and Adversarial Conditions