Gradient Compressed Sensing: A Query-Efficient Gradient Estimator for High-Dimensional Zeroth-Order Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study nonconvex zeroth-order optimization (ZOO) in a high-dimensional space mathbb Rd for functions with approximately s-sparse gradients. To reduce the dependence on the dimensionality d in the query complexity, high-dimensional ZOO methods seek to leverage gradient sparsity to design gradient estimators. The previous best method needs Obig(slogfrac dsbig) queries per step to achieve Obig(frac1Tbig) rate of convergence w.r.t. the number T of steps. In this paper, we propose *Gradient Compressed Sensing* (GraCe), a query-efficient and accurate estimator for sparse gradients that uses only Obig(sloglogfrac dsbig) queries per step and still achieves Obig(frac1Tbig) rate of convergence. To our best knowledge, we are the first to achieve a *double-logarithmic* dependence on d in the query complexity under weaker assumptions. Our proposed GraCe generalizes the Indyk--Price--Woodruff (IPW) algorithm in compressed sensing from linear measurements to nonlinear functions. Furthermore, since the IPW algorithm is purely theoretical due to its impractically large constant, we improve the IPW algorithm via our *dependent random partition* technique together with our corresponding novel analysis and successfully reduce the constant by a factor of nearly 4300. Our GraCe is not only theoretically query-efficient but also achieves strong empirical performance. We benchmark our GraCe against 12 existing ZOO methods with 10000-dimensional functions and demonstrate that GraCe significantly outperforms existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.
Builds on
20 of 58 references.
References · 20
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2018Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Datacited by 301
- 2013Optimal rates for zero-order convex optimization: the power of two function evaluationscited by 198
- 2013Mini-batch Stochastic Approximation Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Composite Optimizationcited by 143
- 2022DIMES: A Differentiable Meta Solver for Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 129
- 2019ZO-AdaMM: Zeroth-Order Adaptive Momentum Method for Black-Box Optimizationcited by 76
- 2024Discrete-state Continuous-time Diffusion for Graph Generationcited by 76
- 2017Stochastic Zeroth-order Optimization in High Dimensionscited by 63
- 2020Zeroth-Order Regularized Optimization (ZORO): Approximately Sparse Gradients and Adaptive Samplingcited by 46
- 2021A Zeroth-Order Block Coordinate Descent Algorithm for Huge-Scale Black-Box Optimizationcited by 46
- 2019Gradientless Descent: High-Dimensional Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 43
- 2023Networked Time Series Imputation via Position-aware Graph Enhanced Variational Autoencoderscited by 32
8 more
- 2023Class-Imbalanced Graph Learning without Class Rebalancingcited by 29
- 2023Ensuring User-side Fairness in Dynamic Recommender Systemscited by 27
- 2024Logic Query of Thoughts: Guiding Large Language Models to Answer Complex Logic Queries with Knowledge Graphscited by 20
- 2023Reconstructing Graph Diffusion History from a Single Snapshotcited by 13
- 2023Privacy-Preserving Graph Machine Learning from Data to Computation: A Surveycited by 10
- 2020Sparse Perturbations for Improved Convergence in Stochastic Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 8
- 2020Information-Theoretic Lower Bounds for Zero-Order Stochastic Gradient Estimationcited by 4
- 2022Zeroth-Order Hard-Thresholding: Gradient Error vs. Expansivitycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 4.
12 papers.
- 2024How Efficient is LLM-Generated Code? A Rigorous & High-Standard Benchmarkcited by 43
- 2025SelfElicit: Your Language Model Secretly Knows Where is the Relevant Evidencecited by 18
- 2025Breaking Silos: Adaptive Model Fusion Unlocks Better Time Series Forecastingcited by 12
- 2024Ask, and it shall be given: On the Turing completeness of promptingcited by 10
- 2025The Multi-Query Paradox in Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 4
- 2025Subspace-based Approximate Hessian Method for Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 2
- 2025Saffron-1: Safety Inference Scalingcited by 1
- 2025Graph Homophily Booster: Rethinking the Role of Discrete Features on Heterophilic Graphscited by 1
- 2026AvAtar: Learning to Align via Active Optimal Transportcited by 1
- 2026ZO-SAM: Zero-Order Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficient Sparse Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Structuring and Tokenizing Distributed User Interest Context for Generative Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026Trust the Direction, Search the Step: Zero-and-First-Order Methods for LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Trust the Direction, Search the Step: Zero-and-First-Order Methods for LLM Fine-Tuning1 Oct 2026
- 2026Structuring and Tokenizing Distributed User Interest Context for Generative Recommendation18 Jun 2026
- 2026AvAtar: Learning to Align via Active Optimal Transport23 May 2026
- 2026ZO-SAM: Zero-Order Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficient Sparse Training13 Mar 2026
- 2025The Multi-Query Paradox in Zeroth-Order Optimization19 Sep 2025
- 2025Graph Homophily Booster: Rethinking the Role of Discrete Features on Heterophilic Graphs16 Sep 2025
- 2025Subspace-based Approximate Hessian Method for Zeroth-Order Optimization8 Jul 2025
- 2025Saffron-1: Safety Inference Scaling6 Jun 2025
- 2025Breaking Silos: Adaptive Model Fusion Unlocks Better Time Series Forecasting24 May 2025
- 2025SelfElicit: Your Language Model Secretly Knows Where is the Relevant Evidence12 Feb 2025
- 2024Ask, and it shall be given: On the Turing completeness of prompting4 Nov 2024
- 2024How Efficient is LLM-Generated Code? A Rigorous & High-Standard Benchmark10 Jun 2024