Direct Behavior Optimization: Unlocking the Potential of Lightweight LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lightweight Large Language Models (LwLLMs) are reduced-parameter, optimized models designed to run efficiently on consumer-grade hardware, offering significant advantages in resource efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and data privacy. However, these models often struggle with limited inference and reasoning capabilities, which restrict their performance on complex tasks and limit their practical applicability. Moreover, existing prompt optimization methods typically rely on extensive manual effort or the meta-cognitive abilities of state-of-the-art LLMs, making them less effective for LwLLMs. To address these challenges, we introduce DeBoP, a new Direct Behavior Optimization Paradigm, original from the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting technique. Unlike CoT Prompting, DeBoP is an automatic optimization method, which focuses on the optimization directly on the behavior of LwLLMs. In particular, DeBoP transforms the optimization of complex prompts into the optimization of discrete, quantifiable execution sequences using a gradient-free Monte Carlo Tree Search. We evaluate DeBoP on seven challenging tasks where state-of-the-art LLMs excel but LwLLMs generally underperform. Experimental results demonstrate that DeBoP significantly outperforms recent prompt optimization methods on most tasks. In particular, DeBoP-optimized LwLLMs surpass GPT-3.5 on most tasks while reducing computational time by approximately 60% compared to other automatic prompt optimization methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.
Builds on
27 of 37 references.
References · 27
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,407
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
- 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 988
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 886
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
- 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 558
- 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 501
15 more
- 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 388
- 2023Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 288
- 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategiescited by 238
- 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 233
- 2023SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 159
- 2023Large Language Models as Evolutionary Optimizerscited by 124
- 2024Self-Discover: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning Structurescited by 110
- 2023Algorithm of Thoughts: Enhancing Exploration of Ideas in Large Language Modelscited by 92
- 2024A New Era in LLM Security: Exploring Security Concerns in Real-World LLM-based Systemscited by 77
- 2021Coherence boosting: When your pretrained language model is not paying enough attentioncited by 38
- 2023AutoHint: Automatic Prompt Optimization with Hint Generationcited by 30
- 2023Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughtscited by 27
- 2022Less is More: Summary of Long Instructions is Better for Program Synthesiscited by 17
- 2023StrategyLLM: Large Language Models as Strategy Generators, Executors, Optimizers, and Evaluators for Problem Solvingcited by 13
- 2023Adaptive-Solver Framework for Dynamic Strategy Selection in Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Rethinking Prompt Optimizers: From Prompt Merits to Optimization
- 2025DEPO: Dual-Efficiency Preference Optimization for LLM Agents
- 2026Frontier LLMs are effective batch optimizers: Assessing reasoning models in continuous and discrete settings
- 2025Self-Supervised Prompt Optimization
- 2024GReaTer: Gradients over Reasoning Makes Smaller Language Models Strong Prompt Optimizers
- 2026Optimizing LLM Prompt Engineering with DSPy Based Declarative Learning
- 2025AutoPDL: Automatic Prompt Optimization for LLM Agents
- 2024LangGPT: Rethinking Structured Reusable Prompt Design Framework for LLMs from the Programming Language