mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometric and Physical Constraints Synergistically Enhance Neural PDE Surrogates

arXiv 2506.05513 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2025cs.LG physics.flu-dyncited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural PDE surrogates can improve the cost-accuracy tradeoff of classical solvers, but often generalize poorly to new initial conditions and accumulate errors over time. Physical and symmetry constraints have shown promise in closing this performance gap, but existing techniques for imposing these inductive biases are incompatible with the staggered grids commonly used in computational fluid dynamics. Here we introduce novel input and output layers that respect physical laws and symmetries on the staggered grids, and for the first time systematically investigate how these constraints, individually and in combination, affect the accuracy of PDE surrogates. We focus on two challenging problems: shallow water equations with closed boundaries and decaying incompressible turbulence. Compared to strong baselines, symmetries and physical constraints consistently improve performance across tasks, architectures, autoregressive prediction steps, accuracy measures, and network sizes. Symmetries are more effective than physical constraints, but surrogates with both performed best, even compared to baselines with data augmentation or pushforward training, while themselves benefiting from the pushforward trick. Doubly-constrained surrogates also generalize better to initial conditions and durations beyond the range of the training data, and more accurately predict real-world ocean currents.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

Builds on

45 of 79 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,154
  4. 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 867
  5. 2018Tensor field networks: Rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3D point cloudscited by 735
  6. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  7. 2020Directional Message Passing for Molecular Graphscited by 556
  8. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
  9. 2018Spherical CNNscited by 452
  10. 2019General E(2)-Equivariant Steerable CNNscited by 441
  11. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 420
  12. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
33 more
  1. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 388
  2. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 368
  3. 2023ClimaX: A foundation model for weather and climatecited by 325
  4. 2019Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Networks and the Icosahedral CNNcited by 262
  5. 2017Learning SO(3) Equivariant Representations with Spherical CNNscited by 244
  6. 2021Factorized Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 237
  7. 2023Neural General Circulation Models for Weather and Climatecited by 232
  8. 2021Geometric and Physical Quantities Improve E(3) Equivariant Message Passingcited by 225
  9. 2023Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Spherecited by 225
  10. 2018PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from Data with A Numeric-Symbolic Hybrid Deep Networkcited by 208
  11. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 207
  12. 2023PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE Solverscited by 205
  13. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 201
  14. 2022Towards Multi-spatiotemporal-scale Generalized PDE Modelingcited by 190
  15. 2016Accelerating Eulerian Fluid Simulation With Convolutional Networkscited by 128
  16. 2020Incorporating Symmetry into Deep Dynamics Models for Improved Generalizationcited by 123
  17. 2020Gauge Equivariant Mesh CNNs: Anisotropic convolutions on geometric graphscited by 90
  18. 2019Learning to Optimize Multigrid PDE Solverscited by 79
  19. 2019Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Convergence Guaranteescited by 77
  20. 2022Lie Point Symmetry Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solverscited by 76
  21. 2023Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulationcited by 65
  22. 2020Group Equivariant Stand-Alone Self-Attention For Visioncited by 63
  23. 2023ACE: A fast, skillful learned global atmospheric model for climate predictioncited by 53
  24. 2023Group Equivariant Fourier Neural Operators for Partial Differential Equationscited by 42
  25. 2022Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary Conditionscited by 33
  26. 2020PDE-based Group Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
  27. 2024Scaling physics-informed hard constraints with mixture-of-expertscited by 24
  28. 2023A Neural PDE Solver with Temporal Stencil Modelingcited by 22
  29. 2020Assessment of unsteady flow predictions using hybrid deep learning based reduced order modelscited by 19
  30. 2024Space-Time Continuous PDE Forecasting using Equivariant Neural Fieldscited by 18
  31. 2023Learning Lagrangian Fluid Mechanics with E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 12
  32. 2023Invariant preservation in machine learned PDE solvers via error correctioncited by 7
  33. 2022Physics-constrained Unsupervised Learning of Partial Differential Equations using Meshescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.