mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Employing Deep Neural Operators for PDE control by decoupling training and optimization

arXiv 2506.04742 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2025math.OC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks have been applied to control problems, typically by combining data, differential equation residuals, and objective costs in the training loss or by incorporating auxiliary architectural components. Instead, we propose a streamlined approach that decouples the control problem from the training process, rendering these additional layers of complexity unnecessary. In particular, our analysis and computational experiments demonstrate that a simple neural operator architecture, such as DeepONet, coupled with an unconstrained optimization routine, can solve tracking-type partial differential equation (PDE) constrained control problems with a single physics-informed training phase and a subsequent optimization phase. We achieve this by adding a penalty term to the cost function based on the differential equation residual to penalize deviations from the PDE constraint. This allows gradient computations with respect to the control using automatic differentiation through the trained neural operator within an iterative optimization routine, while satisfying the PDE constraints. Once trained, the same neural operator can be reused across different tracking targets without retraining. We benchmark our method on scalar elliptic (Poisson's equation), nonlinear transport (viscous Burgers' equation), and flow (Stokes equation) control problems. For the Poisson and Burgers problems, we compare against adjoint-based solvers: for the time-dependent Burgers problem, the approach achieves competitive accuracy with iteration times up to four times faster, while for the linear Poisson problem, the adjoint method retains superior accuracy, suggesting the approach is best suited to nonlinear and time-dependent settings. For the flow control problem, we verify the feasibility of the optimized control through a reference forward solver.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  3. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
  4. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
  5. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 280
  6. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flowscited by 76
  7. 2021Optimal control of PDEs using physics-informed neural networkscited by 52
  8. 2021Solving PDE-constrained Control Problems Using Operator Learningcited by 42
  9. 2022Physics-informed neural networks for PDE-constrained optimization and controlcited by 19
  10. 2021An extended physics informed neural network for preliminary analysis of parametric optimal control problemscited by 16
  11. 2023AONN: An adjoint-oriented neural network method for all-at-once solutions of parametric optimal control problemscited by 13
  12. 2023Neural Operators for PDE Backstepping Control of First-Order Hyperbolic PIDE with Recycle and Delaycited by 13
6 more
  1. 2024Neural Network Approaches for Parameterized Optimal Controlcited by 8
  2. 2024A PINN approach for the online identification and control of unknown PDEscited by 5
  3. 2024Real-time optimal control of high-dimensional parametrized systems by deep learning-based reduced order modelscited by 4
  4. 2019Optimal control of district heating networks using a reduced order modelcited by 1
  5. 2019Nonlinear Optimization of District Heating Networkscited by 1
  6. 2024Optimal Control of a Reaction-Diffusion Epidemic Model with Noncompliancecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.