Mitigating Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
The distributed nature of local differential privacy (LDP) invites data poisoning attacks and poses unforeseen threats to the underlying LDP-supported applications. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive mitigation framework for popular frequency estimation, which contains a suite of novel defenses, including malicious user detection, attack pattern recognition, and damaged utility recovery. In addition to existing attacks, we explore new adaptive adversarial activities for our mitigation design. For detection, we present a new method to precisely identify bogus reports and thus LDP aggregation can be performed over the ``clean'' data. When the attack behavior becomes stealthy and direct filtering out malicious users is difficult, we further propose a detection that can effectively recognize hidden adversarial patterns, thus facilitating the decision-making of service providers. These detection methods require no additional data and attack information and incur minimal computational cost. Our experiment demonstrates their excellent performance and substantial improvement over previous work in various settings. In addition, we conduct an empirical analysis of LDP post-processing for corrupted data recovery and propose a new post-processing method, through which we reveal new insights into protocol recommendations in practice and key design principles for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
13 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024On the Robustness of LDP Protocols for Numerical Attributes under Data Poisoning Attacks28 Mar
- 2022Fine-grained Poisoning Attack to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Mean and Variance Estimation24 May
Other references · 11
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 107
- 2019Collecting and Analyzing Multidimensional Data with Local Differential Privacycited by 49
- 2015Local, Private, Efficient Protocols for Succinct Histogramscited by 36
- 2017Practical Locally Private Heavy Hitterscited by 29
- 2019Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential Privacycited by 28
- 2019Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocolscited by 26
- 2019Estimating Numerical Distributions under Local Differential Privacycited by 17
- 2019Locally Differentially Private Frequency Estimation with Consistencycited by 12
- 2021Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Key-Value Datacited by 10
- 2017Locally Differentially Private Heavy Hitter Identificationcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Revisiting Locally Differentially Private Protocols: Towards Better Trade-offs in Privacy, Utility, and Attack Resistance
- 2024Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining Protocols
- 2025Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Range Query Protocols
- 2024Defending against Data Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning via User Elimination
- 2025Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Trajectory Data
- 2025Augmented Shuffle Protocols for Accurate and Robust Frequency Estimation under Differential Privacy
- 2022Robustness of Locally Differentially Private Graph Analysis Against Poisoning
- 2024Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Graphs