mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Augmented Shuffle Protocols for Accurate and Robust Frequency Estimation under Differential Privacy

arXiv 2504.07362 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2025cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The shuffle model of DP (Differential Privacy) provides high utility by introducing a shuffler that randomly shuffles noisy data sent from users. However, recent studies show that existing shuffle protocols suffer from the following two major drawbacks. First, they are vulnerable to local data poisoning attacks, which manipulate the statistics about input data by sending crafted data, especially when the privacy budget epsilon is small. Second, the actual value of epsilon is increased by collusion attacks by the data collector and users. In this paper, we address these two issues by thoroughly exploring the potential of the augmented shuffle model, which allows the shuffler to perform additional operations, such as random sampling and dummy data addition. Specifically, we propose a generalized framework for local-noise-free protocols in which users send (encrypted) input data to the shuffler without adding noise. We show that this generalized protocol provides DP and is robust to the above two attacks if a simpler mechanism that performs the same process on binary input data provides DP. Based on this framework, we propose three concrete protocols providing DP and robustness against the two attacks. Our first protocol generates the number of dummy values for each item from a binomial distribution and provides higher utility than several state-of-the-art existing shuffle protocols. Our second protocol significantly improves the utility of our first protocol by introducing a novel dummy-count distribution: asymmetric two-sided geometric distribution. Our third protocol is a special case of our second protocol and provides pure epsilon-DP. We show the effectiveness of our protocols through theoretical analysis and comprehensive experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Robust Single-message Shuffle Differential Privacy Protocol for Accurate Distribution Estimation ↗
  2. 2025Augmented Shuffle Differential Privacy Protocols for Large-Domain Categorical and Key-Value Data ↗
  3. 2025Revisiting Locally Differentially Private Protocols: Towards Better Trade-offs in Privacy, Utility, and Attack Resistance
  4. 2024On the Robustness of LDP Protocols for Numerical Attributes under Data Poisoning Attacks
  5. 2025Mitigating Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy
  6. 2022Cactus Mechanisms: Optimal Differential Privacy Mechanisms in the Large-Composition Regime
  7. 2024Noise Variance Optimization in Differential Privacy: A Game-Theoretic Approach Through Per-Instance Differential Privacy ↗
  8. 2026REAEDP: Entropy-Calibrated Differentially Private Data Release with Formal Guarantees and Attack-Based Evaluation