mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VirnyFlow: Optimizing ML Pipelines for Accuracy, Fairness, and Stability at Scale

arXiv 2506.01584 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing machine learning (ML) systems for real-world deployment requires navigating context-dependent trade-offs among accuracy, fairness, stability, and other objectives. Existing AutoML frameworks optimize pipelines efficiently, but they fix the optimization objective up front, leave it outside the developer's control during search, and rarely scale beyond a single node. We present VirnyFlow, a system that optimizes ML pipelines jointly for accuracy, fairness, and stability at scale. A user-defined evaluation protocol, with fairness measured over binary and intersectional groups, drives every layer of the optimizer: multi-objective Bayesian optimization of physical pipelines, cost-aware bandit selection of logical pipelines, and multi-criterion pruning. The architecture combines asynchronous execution over Apache Kafka with database-backed experiment management, providing fine-grained parallelism, fault tolerance, and interactive inspection of trade-offs. On six real-world datasets, VirnyFlow achieves competitive or superior performance compared to state-of-the-art AutoML systems (auto-sklearn, Alpine Meadow, FLAML) under identical resource constraints, scales to 128 workers across four nodes on datasets of up to 2.6M records, and achieves up to 7x higher speedup than the best-scaling single-node baseline, while maintaining stable accuracy and fairness as parallelism increases. A clinical case study on distribution shift and an IRB-approved user study demonstrate human-in-the-loop navigation of trade-offs in practice: rather than returning a single "best" model, VirnyFlow lets data scientists define, inspect, and iteratively refine the objectives of the search to fit their deployment context.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

Builds on

36 of 91 references.

References · 36

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  5. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  6. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  7. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
  8. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  9. 2024Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Sciencecited by 225
  10. 2015Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 221
  11. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 193
  12. 2020Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learningcited by 174
24 more
  1. 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
  2. 2019FLAML: A Fast and Lightweight AutoML Librarycited by 106
  3. 2018A Flexible Framework for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization using Random Scalarizationscited by 99
  4. 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
  5. 2020Max-value Entropy Search for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Constraintscited by 81
  6. 2021YAHPO Gym -- An Efficient Multi-Objective Multi-Fidelity Benchmark for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 62
  7. 2022Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentationcited by 61
  8. 2020Random Hypervolume Scalarizations for Provable Multi-Objective Black Box Optimizationcited by 60
  9. 2019Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization using Pareto-frontier Entropycited by 57
  10. 2022AMLB: an AutoML Benchmarkcited by 55
  11. 2021OpenBox: A Generalized Black-box Optimization Servicecited by 46
  12. 2020Fair Bayesian Optimizationcited by 45
  13. 2022Uncertainty-Aware Search Framework for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 44
  14. 2021Multi-Objective Meta Learningcited by 39
  15. 2022Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine Learning -- An Overviewcited by 37
  16. 2023Can Fairness be Automated? Guidelines and Opportunities for Fairness-aware AutoMLcited by 16
  17. 2023Fairness through Aleatoric Uncertaintycited by 16
  18. 2022Fair and Green Hyperparameter Optimization via Multi-objective and Multiple Information Source Bayesian Optimizationcited by 14
  19. 2022GANDALF: Gated Adaptive Network for Deep Automated Learning of Featurescited by 9
  20. 2020A Scalable and Cloud-Native Hyperparameter Tuning Systemcited by 4
  21. 2023AutoML in Heavily Constrained Applicationscited by 3
  22. 2024Using Case Studies to Teach Responsible AI to Industry Practitionerscited by 3
  23. 2024A Human-in-the-Loop Fairness-Aware Model Selection Framework for Complex Fairness Objective Landscapescited by 3
  24. 2024Still More Shades of Null: An Evaluation Suite for Responsible Missing Value Imputationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.