Speech-to-Speech Translation Pipelines for Conversations in Low-Resource Languages
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The popularity of automatic speech-to-speech translation for human conversations is growing, but the quality varies significantly depending on the language pair. In a context of community interpreting for low-resource languages, namely Turkish and Pashto to/from French, we collected fine-tuning and testing data, and compared systems using several automatic metrics (BLEU, COMET, and BLASER) and human assessments. The pipelines included automatic speech recognition, machine translation, and speech synthesis, with local models and cloud-based commercial ones. Some components have been fine-tuned on our data. We evaluated over 60 pipelines and determined the best one for each direction. We also found that the ranks of components are generally independent of the rest of the pipeline.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
10 of 20 references.
References · 10
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
- 2023Scaling Speech Technology to 1,000+ Languagescited by 411
- 2020Speech Translation and the End-to-End Promise: Taking Stock of Where We Arecited by 77
- 2021Cascade versus Direct Speech Translation: Do the Differences Still Make a Difference?cited by 54
- 2024Findings of the IWSLT 2024 Evaluation Campaigncited by 19
- 2023Recent Advances in Direct Speech-to-text Translationcited by 15
- 2023Improving Cascaded Unsupervised Speech Translation with Denoising Back-translationcited by 5
- 2023Strategies for improving low resource speech to text translation relying on pre-trained ASR modelscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.