mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2506.01201 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

David Marr's seminal theory of human perception stipulates that visual processing is a multi-stage process, prioritizing the derivation of boundary and surface properties before forming semantic object representations. In contrast, contrastive representation learning frameworks typically bypass this explicit multi-stage approach, defining their objective as the direct learning of a semantic representation space for objects. While effective in general contexts, this approach sacrifices the inductive biases of vision, leading to slower convergence speed and learning shortcut resulting in texture bias. In this work, we demonstrate that leveraging Marr's multi-stage theory-by first constructing boundary and surface-level representations using perceptual constructs from early visual processing stages and subsequently training for object semantics-leads to 2x faster convergence on ResNet18, improved final representations on semantic segmentation, depth estimation, and object recognition, and enhanced robustness and out-of-distribution capability. Together, we propose a pretraining stage before the general contrastive representation pretraining to further enhance the final representation quality and reduce the overall convergence time via inductive bias from human vision systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2025.

Builds on

18 of 39 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  5. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  6. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  7. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  8. 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
  9. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  10. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  11. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  12. 2019Video Representation Learning by Dense Predictive Codingcited by 175
6 more
  1. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Dense Visual Representationscited by 147
  2. 2023Intriguing properties of generative classifierscited by 52
  3. 2021TRACER: Extreme Attention Guided Salient Object Tracing Networkcited by 33
  4. 2020On the surprising similarities between supervised and self-supervised modelscited by 29
  5. 2023Emergence of Shape Bias in Convolutional Neural Networks through Activation Sparsitycited by 11
  6. 2023DenseDINO: Boosting Dense Self-Supervised Learning with Token-Based Point-Level Consistencycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.