Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
David Marr's seminal theory of human perception stipulates that visual processing is a multi-stage process, prioritizing the derivation of boundary and surface properties before forming semantic object representations. In contrast, contrastive representation learning frameworks typically bypass this explicit multi-stage approach, defining their objective as the direct learning of a semantic representation space for objects. While effective in general contexts, this approach sacrifices the inductive biases of vision, leading to slower convergence speed and learning shortcut resulting in texture bias. In this work, we demonstrate that leveraging Marr's multi-stage theory-by first constructing boundary and surface-level representations using perceptual constructs from early visual processing stages and subsequently training for object semantics-leads to 2x faster convergence on ResNet18, improved final representations on semantic segmentation, depth estimation, and object recognition, and enhanced robustness and out-of-distribution capability. Together, we propose a pretraining stage before the general contrastive representation pretraining to further enhance the final representation quality and reduce the overall convergence time via inductive bias from human vision systems.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2025.
Builds on
18 of 39 references.
References · 18
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
- 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
- 2019Video Representation Learning by Dense Predictive Codingcited by 175
6 more
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Dense Visual Representationscited by 147
- 2023Intriguing properties of generative classifierscited by 52
- 2021TRACER: Extreme Attention Guided Salient Object Tracing Networkcited by 33
- 2020On the surprising similarities between supervised and self-supervised modelscited by 29
- 2023Emergence of Shape Bias in Convolutional Neural Networks through Activation Sparsitycited by 11
- 2023DenseDINO: Boosting Dense Self-Supervised Learning with Token-Based Point-Level Consistencycited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Reallocating Attention Across Layers to Reduce Multimodal Hallucinationcited by 4
- 2026On the Reliability of Cue Conflict and Beyondcited by 1
- 2026VINO: Video-driven Invariance for Non-contextual Objects via Structural Prior Guided De-contextualizationcited by 0
- 2026Objects Before Words: Object-First Inductive Biases for Grounding Language in Child-View Videocited by 0
- 2026Objects Before Words: Object-First Inductive Biases for Grounding Language in Child-View Video11 Jun 2026
- 2026On the Reliability of Cue Conflict and Beyond11 Mar 2026
- 2026VINO: Video-driven Invariance for Non-contextual Objects via Structural Prior Guided De-contextualization7 Mar 2026
- 2025Reallocating Attention Across Layers to Reduce Multimodal Hallucination11 Oct 2025