mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Blameworthiness in Strategic Games

arXiv 1809.05485 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2018cs.AI cs.GT cs.LOcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There are multiple notions of coalitional responsibility. The focus of this paper is on the blameworthiness defined through the principle of alternative possibilities: a coalition is blamable for a statement if the statement is true, but the coalition had a strategy to prevent it. The main technical result is a sound and complete bimodal logical system that describes properties of blameworthiness in one-shot games.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

9 papers.

  1. 2022From Intelligent Agents to Trustworthy Human-Centred Multiagent Systemscited by 4
  2. 2023Anticipating Responsibility in Multiagent Planningcited by 4
  3. 2023Responsibility in Extensive Form Gamescited by 2
  4. 2025Higher-Order Responsibilitycited by 2
  5. 2025Responsibility Gap and Diffusion in Sequential Decision-Making Mechanismscited by 2
  6. 2026Counterfactual Reasoning for Causal Responsibility Attribution in Probabilistic Multi-Agent Systemscited by 2
  7. 2024Responsibility-aware Strategic Reasoning in Probabilistic Multi-Agent Systemscited by 1
  8. 2025A Graph-Theoretical Perspective on Law Design for Multiagent Systemscited by 1
  9. 2025Diffusion of Responsibility in Collective Decision Makingcited by 0