mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Keeping an Eye on LLM Unlearning: The Hidden Risk and Remedy

arXiv 2506.00359 ↗First posted 31 May 2025cs.CRcited by 9

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks, growing concerns have emerged over the misuse of sensitive, copyrighted, or harmful data during training. To address these concerns, unlearning techniques have been developed to remove the influence of specific data without retraining from scratch. However, this paper reveals a critical vulnerability in fine-tuning-based unlearning: a malicious user can craft a manipulated forgetting request that stealthily degrades the model's utility for benign users. We demonstrate this risk through a red-teaming Stealthy Attack (SA), which is inspired by two key limitations of existing unlearning (the inability to constrain the scope of unlearning effect and the failure to distinguish benign tokens from unlearning signals). Prior work has shown that unlearned models tend to memorize forgetting data as unlearning signals, and respond with hallucinations or feigned ignorance when unlearning signals appear in the input. By subtly increasing the presence of common benign tokens in the forgetting data, SA enhances the connection between benign tokens and unlearning signals. As a result, when normal users include such tokens in their prompts, the model exhibits unlearning behaviors, leading to unintended utility degradation. To address this vulnerability, we propose Scope-aware Unlearning (SU), a lightweight enhancement that introduces a scope term into the unlearning objective, encouraging the model to localize the forgetting effect. Our method requires no additional data processing, integrates seamlessly with existing fine-tuning frameworks, and significantly improves robustness against SA. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of both SA and SU.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 45 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.

Builds on

45 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 31

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A General Framework to Enhance Fine-tuning-based LLM Unlearning25 Feb
  2. 2024Does Unlearning Truly Unlearn? A Black Box Evaluation of LLM Unlearning Methods18 Nov
  3. 2024Unlearning as multi-task optimization: A normalized gradient difference approach with an adaptive learning rate29 Oct
  4. 2024UnStar: Unlearning with Self-Taught Anti-Sample Reasoning for LLMs22 Oct
  5. 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
  6. 2024When Machine Unlearning Meets Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Keep Secret or Forget Knowledge?20 Oct
  7. 2024Evaluating Deep Unlearning in Large Language Models19 Oct
  8. 2024LLM Unlearning via Loss Adjustment with Only Forget Data14 Oct
  9. 2024Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy12 Oct
  10. 2024Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?11 Oct
  11. 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
  12. 2024Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progress3 Oct
19 more
  1. 2024LLM Surgery: Efficient Knowledge Unlearning and Editing in Large Language Models19 Sep
  2. 2024On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearning12 Aug
  3. 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
  4. 2024To Forget or Not? Towards Practical Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models2 Jul
  5. 2024RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models16 Jun
  6. 2024Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Difference12 Jun
  7. 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Prompts12 Jun
  8. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  9. 2024Guardrail Baselines for Unlearning in LLMs5 Mar
  10. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs26 Feb
  11. 2024Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning15 Feb
  12. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  13. 2023Large Language Model Unlearning14 Oct
  14. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
  15. 2023A Duty to Forget, a Right to be Assured? Exposing Vulnerabilities in Machine Unlearning Services15 Sep
  16. 2023KGA: A General Machine Unlearning Framework Based on Knowledge Gap Alignment11 May
  17. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
  18. 2022Continual Learning and Private Unlearning24 Mar
  19. 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug

Other references · 14

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  3. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
  4. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
  5. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  6. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 639
  7. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
  8. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 506
  9. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generationcited by 288
  10. 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Modelscited by 104
  11. 2019Neural Machine Translation: A Review and Surveycited by 100
  12. 2024Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspectivecited by 38
2 more
  1. 2024Is poisoning a real threat to LLM alignment? Maybe more so than you thinkcited by 28
  2. 2025BadJudge: Backdoor Vulnerabilities of LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning
  2. 2025LLM Unlearning on Noisy Forget Sets: A Study of Incomplete, Rewritten, and Watermarked Data
  3. 2024Textual Unlearning Gives a False Sense of Unlearning
  4. 2025Unlearning Imperative: Securing Trustworthy and Responsible LLMs through Engineered Forgetting
  5. 2025Unlearning That Lasts: Utility-Preserving, Robust, and Almost Irreversible Forgetting in LLMs
  6. 2024Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods
  7. 2025Unlearning Isn't Invisible: Detecting Unlearning Traces in LLMs from Model Outputs
  8. 2025Improving LLM Unlearning Robustness via Random Perturbations