Improving LLM Unlearning Robustness via Random Perturbations
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Here, we show that current LLM unlearning methods inherently reduce models' robustness, causing them to misbehave even when a single non-adversarial forget-token is present in the retain-query. Toward understanding underlying causes, we propose a novel theoretical framework that reframes the unlearning process as a backdoor attack and defense problem: we formulate how the forgetting process inadvertently learns to align forget-tokens (backdoor triggers) with the target-representations (target labels). As a result, forget-tokens act as backdoor triggers that, when activated in retain-queries, cause disruptions in unlearned models' behaviors, similar to successful backdoor attacks. The sense that, LLM unlearning methods themselves poison the model, make it more vulnerable to forget-tokens, and hide rather than erase target knowledge, describes their true mechanism. To mitigate the vulnerability caused by the forgetting process, we reinterpret the retaining process as a backdoor defense and propose Random Noise Augmentation (RNA), a lightweight, model and method-agnostic approach with theoretical guarantees for improving the robustness of unlearned models. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RNA significantly improves the robustness of unlearned models while preserving forget and retain performances. This backdoor attack-defense framework offers insights into the mechanism of unlearning that can shed light on future research directions for improving unlearning robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 81 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.
Builds on
81 of 107 references.
Closest ancestors · 28
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety9 Jan
- 2024SEUF: Is Unlearning One Expert Enough for Mixture-of-Experts LLMs?27 Nov
- 2024Provable unlearning in topic modeling and downstream tasks19 Nov
- 2024Does Unlearning Truly Unlearn? A Black Box Evaluation of LLM Unlearning Methods18 Nov
- 2024Extracting Unlearned Information from LLMs with Activation Steering4 Nov
- 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
- 2024LLM Unlearning via Loss Adjustment with Only Forget Data14 Oct
- 2024Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy12 Oct
- 2024Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?11 Oct
- 2024A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models10 Oct
- 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
- 2024Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progress3 Oct
16 more
- 2024An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety26 Sep
- 2024Towards Robust Knowledge Unlearning: An Adversarial Framework for Assessing and Improving Unlearning Robustness in Large Language Models20 Aug
- 2024On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearning12 Aug
- 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
- 2024UnUnlearning: Unlearning is not sufficient for content regulation in advanced generative AI27 Jun
- 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning19 Jun
- 2024Cross-Lingual Unlearning of Selective Knowledge in Multilingual Language Models18 Jun
- 2024RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models16 Jun
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
- 2024Guardrail Baselines for Unlearning in LLMs5 Mar
- 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs26 Feb
- 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models13 Feb
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
- 2023In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearners11 Oct
- 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
- 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearning6 Sep
Other references · 53
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
38 more
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
- 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 419
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
- 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
- 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 254
- 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modificationscited by 220
- 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
- 2024A Mechanistic Understanding of Alignment Algorithms: A Case Study on DPO and Toxicitycited by 179
- 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
- 2023Can Sensitive Information Be Deleted From LLMs? Objectives for Defending Against Extraction Attackscited by 156
- 2024Tamper-Resistant Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMscited by 132
- 2018Parametric Noise Injection: Trainable Randomness to Improve Deep Neural Network Robustness against Adversarial Attackcited by 123
- 2023Copyright Violations and Large Language Modelscited by 108
- 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Hack Websitescited by 108
- 2023Smoothing the Landscape Boosts the Signal for SGD: Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning Single Index Modelscited by 60
- 2023Unveiling the Implicit Toxicity in Large Language Modelscited by 51
- 2021Random Noise Defense Against Query-Based Black-Box Attackscited by 46
- 2023Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design toolscited by 43
- 2024Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Modelscited by 42
- 2024Large Language Models Relearn Removed Conceptscited by 26
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2026Position: The Term "Machine Unlearning" Is Overused in LLMscited by 3
- 2025A Survey on Unlearning in Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Beyond Sharp Minima: Robust LLM Unlearning via Feedback-Guided Multi-Point Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Beyond Forgetting: Representation Misdirection Elicits Controllable Side Behaviors and Capabilitiescited by 1
- 2026Can Large Language Models Reinvent Foundational Algorithms?cited by 0
- 2026LLM Unlearning for Cyber Defense: A Survey on Methods, Challenges, and Emerging Threatscited by 0
- 2026LLM Unlearning for Cyber Defense: A Survey on Methods, Challenges, and Emerging Threats23 Jun 2026
- 2026Position: The Term "Machine Unlearning" Is Overused in LLMs8 May 2026
- 2026Can Large Language Models Reinvent Foundational Algorithms?7 Apr 2026
- 2026Beyond Forgetting: Representation Misdirection Elicits Controllable Side Behaviors and Capabilities29 Jan 2026
- 2025A Survey on Unlearning in Large Language Models29 Oct 2025
- 2025Beyond Sharp Minima: Robust LLM Unlearning via Feedback-Guided Multi-Point Optimization24 Sep 2025