mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic

arXiv 2506.00335 ↗First posted 31 May 2025stat.ME cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Selection bias, arising from the systematic inclusion or exclusion of certain samples, poses a significant challenge to the validity of causal inference. While Bareinboim et al. introduced methods for recovering unbiased observational and interventional distributions from biased data using partial external information, the complexity of the backdoor adjustment and the method's strong reliance on observational data limit its applicability in many practical settings. In this paper, we formally discover the recoverability of P(Y^*x^*) under selection bias with experimental data. By explicitly constructing counterfactual worlds via Structural Causal Models (SCMs), we analyze how selection mechanisms in the observational world propagate to the counterfactual domain. We derive a complete set of graphical and theoretical criteria to determine that the experimental distribution remain unaffected by selection bias. Furthermore, we propose principled methods for leveraging partially unbiased observational data to recover P(Y^*x^*) from biased experimental datasets. Simulation studies replicating realistic research scenarios demonstrate the practical utility of our approach, offering concrete guidance for mitigating selection bias in applied causal inference.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.

Builds on

7 of 24 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
  2. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
  3. 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 175
  4. 2013Counterfactual Probabilities: Computational Methods, Bounds and Applicationscited by 67
  5. 2021Stereotype and Skew: Quantifying Gender Bias in Pre-trained and Fine-tuned Language Modelscited by 57
  6. 2021It Is Different When Items Are Older: Debiasing Recommendations When Selection Bias and User Preferences Are Dynamiccited by 10
  7. 2022Selection Bias Induced Spurious Correlations in Large Language Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024DiffusionCounterfactuals: Inferring High-dimensional Counterfactuals with Guidance of Causal Representations
  2. 2025Counterfactual Realizability
  3. 2026Debiased Counterfactual Generation via Flow Matching from Observations
  4. 2026CausalReasoningBenchmark: A Real-World Benchmark for Disentangled Evaluation of Causal Identification and Estimation
  5. 2025Flow IV: Counterfactual Inference In Nonseparable Outcome Models Using Instrumental Variables
  6. 2025Transportability without Graphs: A Bayesian Approach to Identifying s-Admissible Backdoor Sets
  7. 2025Counterfactual Identifiability via Dynamic Optimal Transport
  8. 2022Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization Approach