It Is Different When Items Are Older: Debiasing Recommendations When Selection Bias and User Preferences Are Dynamic
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
User interactions with recommender systems (RSs) are affected by user selection bias, e.g., users are more likely to rate popular items (popularity bias) or items that they expect to enjoy beforehand (positivity bias). Methods exist for mitigating the effects of selection bias in user ratings on the evaluation and optimization of RSs. However, these methods treat selection bias as static, despite the fact that the popularity of an item may change drastically over time and the fact that user preferences may also change over time. We focus on the age of an item and its effect on selection bias and user preferences. Our experimental analysis reveals that the rating behavior of users on the MovieLens dataset is better captured by methods that consider effects from the age of item on bias and preferences. We theoretically show that in a dynamic scenario in which both the selection bias and user preferences are dynamic, existing debiasing methods are no longer unbiased. To address this limitation, we introduce DebiAsing in the dyNamiC scEnaRio (DANCER), a novel debiasing method that extends the inverse propensity scoring debiasing method to account for dynamic selection bias and user preferences. Our experimental results indicate that DANCER improves rating prediction performance compared to debiasing methods that incorrectly assume that selection bias is static in a dynamic scenario. To the best of our knowledge, DANCER is the first debiasing method that accounts for dynamic selection bias and user preferences in RSs.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 42
- 2023A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systemscited by 14
- 2023Recent Developments in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 14
- 2022Towards Disentangling Relevance and Bias in Unbiased Learning to Rankcited by 9
- 2023RecFusion: A Binomial Diffusion Process for 1D Data for Recommendationcited by 6
- 2023A Lightweight Method for Modeling Confidence in Recommendations with Learned Beta Distributionscited by 2
- 2024Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interferencecited by 2
- 2025Finding Interest Needle in Popularity Haystack: Improving Retrieval by Modeling Item Exposurecited by 0
- 2025Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logiccited by 0
- 2026Debiasing Sequential Recommendation with Time-aware Inverse Propensity Scoringcited by 0
- 2026Debiasing Sequential Recommendation with Time-aware Inverse Propensity Scoring5 Mar 2026
- 2025Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic31 May 2025
- 2025Finding Interest Needle in Popularity Haystack: Improving Retrieval by Modeling Item Exposure31 Mar 2025
- 2024Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interference30 Apr 2024
- 2023A Lightweight Method for Modeling Confidence in Recommendations with Learned Beta Distributions6 Aug 2023
- 2023A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems2 Aug 2023
- 2023Recent Developments in Recommender Systems: A Survey22 Jun 2023
- 2023RecFusion: A Binomial Diffusion Process for 1D Data for Recommendation15 Jun 2023
- 2023A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systems1 Jun 2023
- 2022Towards Disentangling Relevance and Bias in Unbiased Learning to Rank28 Dec 2022