Improving Protein Sequence Design through Designability Preference Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Protein sequence design methods have demonstrated strong performance in sequence generation for de novo protein design. However, as the training objective was sequence recovery, it does not guarantee designability--the likelihood that a designed sequence folds into the desired structure. To bridge this gap, we redefine the training objective by steering sequence generation toward high designability. To do this, we integrate Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), using AlphaFold pLDDT scores as the preference signal, which significantly improves the in silico design success rate. To further refine sequence generation at a finer, residue-level granularity, we introduce Residue-level Designability Preference Optimization (ResiDPO), which applies residue-level structural rewards and decouples optimization across residues. This enables direct improvement in designability while preserving regions that already perform well. Using a curated dataset with residue-level annotations, we fine-tune LigandMPNN with ResiDPO to obtain EnhancedMPNN, which achieves a nearly 3-fold increase in in silico design success rate (from 6.56% to 17.57%) on a challenging enzyme design benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
20 of 47 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
- 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimizationcited by 323
- 2020Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptronscited by 313
- 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignmentcited by 232
- 2022Biological Sequence Design with GFlowNetscited by 174
- 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedbackcited by 135
8 more
- 2024LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rankcited by 96
- 2024Noise Contrastive Alignment of Language Models with Explicit Rewardscited by 85
- 2022PiFold: Toward effective and efficient protein inverse foldingcited by 83
- 2023Structure-informed Language Models Are Protein Designerscited by 68
- 2024ProteinBench: A Holistic Evaluation of Protein Foundation Modelscited by 25
- 2022Generative De Novo Protein Design with Global Contextcited by 16
- 2024UniIF: Unified Molecule Inverse Foldingcited by 9
- 2024Improving Inverse Folding for Peptide Design with Diversity-regularized Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025ProteinZero: Self-Improving Protein Generation via Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2026Property-driven Protein Inverse Folding With Multi-Objective Preference Alignmentcited by 3
- 2025g-DPO: Scalable Preference Optimization for Protein Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026PepEDiff: Zero-Shot Peptide Binder Design via Protein Embedding Diffusioncited by 0
- 2026RosettaSearch: Multi-Objective Inference-Time Search for Protein Sequence Designcited by 0
- 2026Preference-based Antibody Expression Ranking: Scaling with Large-scale Weak Supervisioncited by 0
- 2026Preference-based Antibody Expression Ranking: Scaling with Large-scale Weak Supervision29 Jun 2026
- 2026RosettaSearch: Multi-Objective Inference-Time Search for Protein Sequence Design19 Apr 2026
- 2026Property-driven Protein Inverse Folding With Multi-Objective Preference Alignment6 Mar 2026
- 2026PepEDiff: Zero-Shot Peptide Binder Design via Protein Embedding Diffusion19 Jan 2026
- 2025g-DPO: Scalable Preference Optimization for Protein Language Models22 Oct 2025
- 2025ProteinZero: Self-Improving Protein Generation via Online Reinforcement Learning9 Jun 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ProteinOPD: Towards Effective and Efficient Preference Alignment for Protein Design
- 2025Protein Inverse Folding From Structure Feedback
- 2026Self-Improvement Imitation with Biologically Guided Search for Protein Design Under Oracle Budgets
- 2024Preference optimization of protein language models as a multi-objective binder design paradigm
- 2026FAR-DPO: Feasibility-Aware and Robust Direct Preference Optimization for Cyclic Peptide Design
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for Sequence Design Leveraging Protein Language Models
- 2025De Novo Molecular Design Enabled by Direct Preference Optimization and Curriculum Learning
- 2025Swarms of Large Language Model Agents for Protein Sequence Design with Experimental Validation