mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Inverse Folding for Peptide Design with Diversity-regularized Direct Preference Optimization

arXiv 2410.19471 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inverse folding models play an important role in structure-based design by predicting amino acid sequences that fold into desired reference structures. Models like ProteinMPNN, a message-passing encoder-decoder model, are trained to reliably produce new sequences from a reference structure. However, when applied to peptides, these models are prone to generating repetitive sequences that do not fold into the reference structure. To address this, we fine-tune ProteinMPNN to produce diverse and structurally consistent peptide sequences via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). We derive two enhancements to DPO: online diversity regularization and domain-specific priors. Additionally, we develop a new understanding on improving diversity in decoder models. When conditioned on OpenFold generated structures, our fine-tuned models achieve state-of-the-art structural similarity scores, improving base ProteinMPNN by at least 8%. Compared to standard DPO, our regularized method achieves up to 20% higher sequence diversity with no loss in structural similarity score.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2024.

Builds on

13 of 40 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2020Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptronscited by 313
  5. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 196
  6. 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraintscited by 174
  7. 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 124
  8. 2022PiFold: Toward effective and efficient protein inverse foldingcited by 83
  9. 2021Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for 3D Macromolecular Structurecited by 53
  10. 2023Graph Denoising Diffusion for Inverse Protein Foldingcited by 44
  11. 2023Knowledge-Design: Pushing the Limit of Protein Design via Knowledge Refinementcited by 12
  12. 2023Preference Optimization for Molecular Language Modelscited by 7
1 more
  1. 2024Preference optimization of protein language models as a multi-objective binder design paradigmcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Property-driven Protein Inverse Folding With Multi-Objective Preference Alignment
  2. 2024Reinforcement learning on structure-conditioned categorical diffusion for protein inverse folding
  3. 2022AlphaFold Distillation for Protein Design
  4. 2025EnerBridge-DPO: Energy-Guided Protein Inverse Folding with Markov Bridges and Direct Preference Optimization
  5. 2024Diffusion Model with Representation Alignment for Protein Inverse Folding
  6. 2025RadDiff: Retrieval-Augmented Denoising Diffusion for Protein Inverse Folding
  7. 2026FAR-DPO: Feasibility-Aware and Robust Direct Preference Optimization for Cyclic Peptide Design
  8. 2025ProtInvTree: Deliberate Protein Inverse Folding with Reward-guided Tree Search